Literature DB >> 19779301

HeartMate left ventricular assist system exchange: results and technical considerations.

Robert M Adamson1, Walter P Dembitsky, Sam Baradarian, Joseph Chammas, Brian Jaski, Peter Hoagland, Vicki McCalmont, Kristi Ortiz, Marsha Stahovich, Suzanne Chillcott.   

Abstract

The duration times of left ventricular assist system (LVAS) support have increased because of prolonged wait times for transplant and the more frequent use of devices for destination therapy. The HeartMate LVAS, the only device approved for bridge to transplant and destination therapy, has limited durability, making replacement increasingly necessary. Since 1996, we have exchanged 19 left ventricular assist devices in 15 patients (11 men: mean age, 57.1 years; range, 33-77 years). Most of the devices (14) were replaced with the HeartMate vented electric/extended-lead vented electric pump; five devices were exchanged for a HeartMate II LVAS. Bearing failure was the most frequent reason for exchange (15 of 19 pumps); four of the 19 pumps also had active device-related infections at the time of exchange. There were no early deaths (30 days). Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 85% at 1 year, 67% at 2 years, and 56% at 3 years. Three patients had transplants (mean, 518 days); six patients died during support (mean, 934 days), and six patients remain on LVAS support (mean, 1,219 days). One patient has been on device for over 6 years. Left ventricular assist devices exchange is becoming increasingly likely and can be associated with acceptably low-operative mortality rates and good intermediate-term survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19779301     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181bd446a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  5 in total

1.  Exchange of DuraHeart left ventricular assist device via a subcostal approach.

Authors:  Masashi Kawamura; Taichi Sakaguchi; Shigeru Miyagawa; Hiroyuki Nishi; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Satsuki Fukushima; Shunsuke Saito; Takayoshi Ueno; Toru Kuratani; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  Durability of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ashleigh Xie; Kevin Phan; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-11

3.  Outcomes after implantable left ventricular assist device replacement procedures.

Authors:  Matthew A Schechter; Mani A Daneshmand; Chetan B Patel; Laura J Blue; Joseph G Rogers; Carmelo A Milano
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  Suspected involvement of EPTFE membrane in sterile intrathoracic abscess and pericardial empyema in a multi-allergic LVAD recipient: a case report.

Authors:  A Kornberger; V Walter; M Khalil; P Therapidis; B Assmus; A Moritz; A Beiras-Fernandez; U A Stock
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Approaches to ventricular assist device exchange: Resternotomy versus limited incisions.

Authors:  Asishana A Osho; David A D'Alessandro
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2022-01-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.