PURPOSE: Transperitoneal radical cystectomy with intraperitoneal ileal neobladder is the standard surgical treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. To reduce morbidity, we established in 2002 an extraperitoneal approach including extraperitonealization of the ileal neobladder. This retrospective study compares the results of the two procedures with a focus on the peri- and postoperative course. METHODS: Ninety-five male patients with invasive urothelial cancer who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal neobladder at our hospital from January 1998 to May 2007 were analyzed. Forty-seven patients underwent transperitoneal radical cystectomy with intraperitoneal ileal neobladder. The remaining 48 were submitted to the extraperitoneal technique with extraperitonealization of the neobladder. We compared both methods regarding operating time, intraoperative blood loss, complications and oncological outcome. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative ileus was significantly lower after the extraperitoneal than after the transperitoneal approach (2/48 vs. 10/47 cases; p = 0.012). However, pelvic lymphoceles were more frequent (6 vs. 0 cases; p = 0.014). The two techniques did not differ with regard to the other major and minor complications, the operating time (mean 377.4 vs. 405.4 min) or the intraoperative blood loss (mean 363 vs. 412 ml). Oncological outcome disclosed no difference between both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The extraperitoneal technique with extraperitonealization of the ileal neobladder is comparable in safety and reliability to the transperitoneal surgical approach and yields good peri- and postoperative results with regard to the parameters we examined. Noteworthy are the significant reduction of postoperative ileus and the higher incidence of lymphoceles. Both may be caused by the separate extraperitoneal regional healing processes.
PURPOSE: Transperitoneal radical cystectomy with intraperitoneal ileal neobladder is the standard surgical treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. To reduce morbidity, we established in 2002 an extraperitoneal approach including extraperitonealization of the ileal neobladder. This retrospective study compares the results of the two procedures with a focus on the peri- and postoperative course. METHODS: Ninety-five male patients with invasive urothelial cancer who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal neobladder at our hospital from January 1998 to May 2007 were analyzed. Forty-seven patients underwent transperitoneal radical cystectomy with intraperitoneal ileal neobladder. The remaining 48 were submitted to the extraperitoneal technique with extraperitonealization of the neobladder. We compared both methods regarding operating time, intraoperative blood loss, complications and oncological outcome. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative ileus was significantly lower after the extraperitoneal than after the transperitoneal approach (2/48 vs. 10/47 cases; p = 0.012). However, pelvic lymphoceles were more frequent (6 vs. 0 cases; p = 0.014). The two techniques did not differ with regard to the other major and minor complications, the operating time (mean 377.4 vs. 405.4 min) or the intraoperative blood loss (mean 363 vs. 412 ml). Oncological outcome disclosed no difference between both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The extraperitoneal technique with extraperitonealization of the ileal neobladder is comparable in safety and reliability to the transperitoneal surgical approach and yields good peri- and postoperative results with regard to the parameters we examined. Noteworthy are the significant reduction of postoperative ileus and the higher incidence of lymphoceles. Both may be caused by the separate extraperitoneal regional healing processes.
Authors: Brent K Hollenbeck; David C Miller; David Taub; Rodney L Dunn; Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; James E Montie; Willie Underwood; John T Wei Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen; Remco R de Vries; Alex Bex; Henk G van der Poel; Wim Meinhardt; Ninja Antonini; Simon Horenblas Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2007-09-18 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Agostino Mattei; Frederic D Birkhaeuser; Christian Baermann; Sebastian H Warncke; Urs E Studer Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-12-21 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Florian Jentzmik; Andres J Schrader; Robert de Petriconi; Robert Hefty; Johannes Mueller; Johannes Doetterl; Alexander Eickhoff; Mark Schrader Journal: World J Urol Date: 2012-02-10 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Barbara Erber; Mark Schrader; Kurt Miller; Martin Schostak; Daniel Baumunk; Anja Lingnau; Andres Jan Schrader; Florian Jentzmik Journal: ISRN Urol Date: 2012-02-06
Authors: Alexander Kretschmer; Tobias Grimm; Alexander Buchner; Christian G Stief; Alexander Karl Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2016 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.541
Authors: Young Dong Yu; Jin Ho Hwang; Young Eun Seo; Byung Do Song; Yeon Soo Jung; Dong Hwan Lee; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee; Jong Jin Oh Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 4.379