Literature DB >> 17904276

Urinary diversions after cystectomy: the association of clinical factors, complications and functional results of four different diversions.

Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen1, Remco R de Vries, Alex Bex, Henk G van der Poel, Wim Meinhardt, Ninja Antonini, Simon Horenblas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We present a single institute experience of the four most widely used diversions after cystectomy in 281 patients, with an evaluation of the association between clinical factors, complication rates, functional results, and metabolic complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1990 and 2005, 281 consecutive cystectomies were performed at our institute. Four different diversions were offered: an ileal conduit according to Bricker (IC; 118 patients), an Indiana pouch (IP; 51 patients), and orthotopic diversions after cystectomy/neobladder (N; 62 patients), or sexuality-preserving cystectomy and neobladder (SPCN; 50 patients).
RESULTS: Forty-four percent developed early complications: IC 48%, IP 43%, N 42%, and SPCN 38%. High ASA score was the only variable significantly associated with early major complications (ASA 1 vs. 3: HR, 0.32; 95%CI, 0.14-0.72). Late complication rate was 51% with fewer complications in the IC group, IC 39%, IP 63%, N 59%, and SPCN 60% (HR, 0.32; 95%CI, 0.14-0.72), which was explained by fewer uncomplicated urinary tract infections (one third of all late complications) in the IC group. There were no differences in experienced late major complications. We found no significant association between tumour stage, ASA, age, preoperative radiotherapy, gender, and diversion-related complication rates. Complete daytime and nighttime continence, respectively, was achieved in 96% and 73% after IP, 90% and 67% after neobladder, and 96% and 67% after SPCN. Metabolic changes were found in 24% of the patients: 21% after IC, 26% after IP, and 28% after orthotopic diversion (neobladder and SPCN combined); low vitamin B12 was measured in 23%, 15%, and 15% respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Cystectomy with any subsequent diversion remains a procedure with considerable morbidity. High ASA score was associated with more early complications. Orthotopic diversions provide good functional results, but at the cost of more late complications compared with ileal conduits. We found no evidence that age, ASA score, positive lymph nodes, extravesical tumour growth, or previous radiotherapy were contraindications per se for any diversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17904276     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  46 in total

1.  [Urinary diversion and colon: transverse conduit and transverse pouch].

Authors:  S A Ahyai; K Sayedahmed; O Engel; F Chun; R Dahlem; M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Sources of variation in follow-up expenditure after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Goutham Vemana; Joel Vetter; Ling Chen; Gurdarshan Sandhu; Seth A Strope
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Extraperitoneal radical cystectomy with extraperitonealization of the ileal neobladder: a comparison to the transperitoneal technique.

Authors:  Florian Jentzmik; Martin Schostak; Carsten Stephan; Daniel Baumunk; Anja Lingnau; Steffen Weikert; Michael Lein; Kurt Miller; Mark Schrader
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Bricker versus Wallace anastomosis: A meta-analysis of ureteroenteric stricture rates after ileal conduit urinary diversion.

Authors:  Niall F Davis; John P Burke; Ted McDermott; Robert Flynn; Rustom P Manecksha; John A Thornhill
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Use of Bowel in Reconstructive Urology: What a Colorectal Surgeon Should Know.

Authors:  Christopher D Morrison; Stephanie J Kielb
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-05-22

6.  Trends in urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Kinan Bachour; Izak Faiena; Amirali Salmasi; Andrew T Lenis; David C Johnson; Aydin Pooli; Alexandra Drakaki; Allan J Pantuck; Karim Chamie
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes of ileal conduit and orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion.

Authors:  Eva Browne; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Greg S Jack; Niall F Davis
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  A prospective randomized pilot study evaluating an ERAS protocol versus a standard protocol for patients treated with radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Sebastian Karl Frees; Jonathan Aning; Peter Black; Werner Struss; Robert Bell; Claudia Chavez-Munoz; Martin Gleave; Alan I So
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Ureterocutaneostomy: for whom and when?

Authors:  Zafer Kozacıoğlu; Tansu Değirmenci; Bülent Günlüsoy; Yasin Ceylan; Süleyman Minareci
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-09

10.  [Urinary diversion with continent umbilical stoma: Which techniques are suitable for which patients?].

Authors:  T Kälble
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.