Literature DB >> 19777094

A peer review process for classroom teaching.

Marlea G Wellein1, Kelly R Ragucci, Marc Lapointe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Describe the planning, implementation, and faculty perceptions of a classroom peer-review process, including an evaluation tool.
DESIGN: A process for peer evaluation of classroom teaching and its evaluation tool were developed and implemented by a volunteer faculty committee within our department. At the end of the year, all faculty members were asked to complete an online anonymous survey to evaluate the experience. ASSESSMENT: The majority of faculty members either agreed or strongly agreed that the overall evaluation process was beneficial for both evaluators and for those being evaluated. Some areas of improvement related to the process and its evaluation tool also were identified.
SUMMARY: The process of developing and implementing a peer-evaluation process for classroom teaching was found to be beneficial for faculty members, and the survey results affirmed the need and continuation of such a process.

Keywords:  assessment; classroom; faculty; peer evaluation; survey; teaching

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19777094      PMCID: PMC2739062          DOI: 10.5688/aj730579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  2 in total

1.  The planning and implementation of a faculty peer review teaching project.

Authors:  Karen K Schultz; David Latif
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Evaluation of an evidence-based peer teaching assessment program.

Authors:  Laura B Hansen; Marianne McCollum; Susan M Paulsen; Thomas Cyr; Catherine L Jarvis; Glenda Tate; Ralph J Altiere
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

  2 in total
  7 in total

1.  Recognition of teaching excellence.

Authors:  Dana Hammer; Peggy Piascik; Melissa Medina; Amy Pittenger; Renee Rose; Freddy Creekmore; Robert Soltis; Alicia Bouldin; Lindsay Schwarz; Steven Scott
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Peer evaluations can be problematic.

Authors:  Marshall E Cates; Mary R Monk-Tutor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Evaluation of a Teaching Assistant Program for Third-Year Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  Courtney L Bradley; Julia Khanova; Kelly L Scolaro
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Assessment of full-time faculty preceptors by colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States and Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Harold L Kirschenbaum; Tina Zerilli
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Development of an Instrument to Assess the Clinical Effectiveness of the Debriefer in Simulation Education.

Authors:  Jennifer L Saylor; Susan F Wainwright; E A Herge; Ryan T Pohlig
Journal:  J Allied Health       Date:  2016

6.  Impact and Attitudes about Peer Review of Teaching in a Canadian Pharmacy School.

Authors:  Cynthia L Richard; Elaine Lillie; Kaitlin Mathias; Thomas McFarlane
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Development and implementation of a formative instructional coaching program using the Teaching Practices Inventory within a health professions program.

Authors:  Amanda A Olsen; Kathryn A Morbitzer; Skye Zambrano; Jacqueline M Zeeman; Adam M Persky; Antonio Bush; Jacqueline E McLaughlin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 3.263

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.