Literature DB >> 19776592

Should we customize fetal growth standards?

F Figueras1, J Gardosi.   

Abstract

Several maternal and fetal physiological characteristics account for a substantial proportion of the variation in birth weight. These characteristics can be used to calculate an individualized optimal birth weight and to adjust or 'customize' the birth weight standard. Customized birth weight standards improve the distinction between constitutional and pathological smallness, and there is evidence that this finding can be extrapolated into the fetal period to evaluate intrauterine growth, but further studies are required to evaluate and quantify the effectiveness of customized versus conventional charts in improving the diagnosis of pathological smallness before birth. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19776592     DOI: 10.1159/000235875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1015-3837            Impact factor:   2.587


  8 in total

1.  Customized versus population approach for evaluation of fetal overgrowth.

Authors:  Maged M Costantine; Lisa Mele; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Susan M Ramin; Brian Casey; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; Dwight J Rouse; John M Thorp; Anthony Sciscione; Patrick Catalano; Steve N Caritis; Yoram Sorokin; Alan M Peaceman; Jorge E Tolosa; Garland D Anderson
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Adi L Tarca; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-07-11

3.  Early diagnosis and treatment referral of children born small for gestational age without catch-up growth are critical for optimal growth outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher P Houk; Peter A Lee
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2012-05-04

Review 4.  Predictive factors for intrauterine growth restriction.

Authors:  A R Albu; A F Anca; V V Horhoianu; I A Horhoianu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014-06-25

5.  Maternal risk factors for low birth weight for term births in a developed region in China: a hospital-based study of 55,633 pregnancies.

Authors:  Yihua Bian; Zhan Zhang; Qiao Liu; Di Wu; Shoulin Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2012-12-15

6.  Intrauterine growth restriction: effects of physiological fetal growth determinants on diagnosis.

Authors:  Kjell Haram; Eirik Søfteland; Radek Bukowski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-06-23

7.  Clinical prediction in early pregnancy of infants small for gestational age by customised birthweight centiles: findings from a healthy nulliparous cohort.

Authors:  Lesley M E McCowan; John M D Thompson; Rennae S Taylor; Robyn A North; Lucilla Poston; Philip N Baker; Jenny Myers; Claire T Roberts; Gustaaf A Dekker; Nigel A B Simpson; James J Walker; Louise C Kenny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  2500-g Low Birth Weight Cutoff: History and Implications for Future Research and Policy.

Authors:  Michelle M Hughes; Robert E Black; Joanne Katz
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.