BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The intracellular signalling kinase, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) is required for new memory formation, suggesting that control of ERK signalling might be a target for the treatment of cognitive dysfunction. Previously, we reported that tanshinone congeners have ameliorating effects on drug-induced memory impairment in mice. Here, we have investigated possible modes of action of tanshinone I on learning and memory, associated with ERK phosphorylation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Using immunohistochemical, Western blot techniques, and behavioural testing, we studied the effect of tanshinone I on memory impairment induced by diazepam or dizocilpine (MK-801) in mice. KEY RESULTS: Tanshinone I (2 or 4 mg.kg(-1), p.o.) increased latency times versus vehicle-treated control group in the passive avoidance task. Western blot analysis and immunohistochemical data showed that tanshinone I (4 mg.kg(-1)) increased levels of phosphorylated cAMP response element binding protein (pCREB) and phosphorylated ERK (pERK) in the hippocampus. These increases in pCREB and pERK were blocked by U0126 (inhibitor of ERK1/2), which also prevented the increase in passive avoidance task latency time after tanshinone I. In models of learning and memory impairment induced by diazepam and MK-801, tanshinone I (4 mg.kg(-1)) reversed learning and memory impairments detected by the passive avoidance test. Western blot analysis showed that tanshinone I reversed the diazepam- and MK-801-induced inhibitions of ERK and CREB activation in hippocampal tissues. These effects were also blocked by U0126. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Tanshinone I ameliorates the learning and memory impairments induced by diazepam and MK-801 through activation of ERK signalling.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The intracellular signalling kinase, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) is required for new memory formation, suggesting that control of ERK signalling might be a target for the treatment of cognitive dysfunction. Previously, we reported that tanshinone congeners have ameliorating effects on drug-induced memory impairment in mice. Here, we have investigated possible modes of action of tanshinone I on learning and memory, associated with ERK phosphorylation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Using immunohistochemical, Western blot techniques, and behavioural testing, we studied the effect of tanshinone I on memory impairment induced by diazepam or dizocilpine (MK-801) in mice. KEY RESULTS:Tanshinone I (2 or 4 mg.kg(-1), p.o.) increased latency times versus vehicle-treated control group in the passive avoidance task. Western blot analysis and immunohistochemical data showed that tanshinone I (4 mg.kg(-1)) increased levels of phosphorylated cAMP response element binding protein (pCREB) and phosphorylated ERK (pERK) in the hippocampus. These increases in pCREB and pERK were blocked by U0126 (inhibitor of ERK1/2), which also prevented the increase in passive avoidance task latency time after tanshinone I. In models of learning and memory impairment induced by diazepam and MK-801, tanshinone I (4 mg.kg(-1)) reversed learning and memory impairments detected by the passive avoidance test. Western blot analysis showed that tanshinone I reversed the diazepam- and MK-801-induced inhibitions of ERK and CREB activation in hippocampal tissues. These effects were also blocked by U0126. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Tanshinone I ameliorates the learning and memory impairments induced by diazepam and MK-801 through activation of ERK signalling.
Authors: Christopher Pittenger; Yan You Huang; Ronald F Paletzki; Roussoudan Bourtchouladze; Heather Scanlin; Svetlana Vronskaya; Eric R Kandel Journal: Neuron Date: 2002-04-25 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: M Cammarota; L R Bevilaqua; P Ardenghi; G Paratcha; M Levi de Stein; I Izquierdo; J H Medina Journal: Brain Res Mol Brain Res Date: 2000-03-10
Authors: Dong Hyun Kim; Jong Min Kim; Se Jin Park; Seungheon Lee; Chan Young Shin; Jae Hoon Cheong; Jong Hoon Ryu Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Bai Hui Chen; Joon Ha Park; Jeong Hwi Cho; In Hye Kim; Jae Chul Lee; Tae-Kyeong Lee; Ji Hyeon Ahn; Hyun Jin Tae; Bich Na Shin; Jong-Dai Kim; Il Jun Kang; Moo-Ho Won; Yun Lyul Lee Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Naif E Al Omairi; Ashraf Y Al-Brakati; Rami B Kassab; Maha S Lokman; Ehab Kotb Elmahallawy; Hatem K Amin; Ahmed E Abdel Moneim Journal: Metab Brain Dis Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 3.584
Authors: Stephanie C Licata; Nina M Shinday; Megan N Huizenga; Shayna B Darnell; Gavin R Sangrey; Uwe Rudolph; James K Rowlett; Ghazaleh Sadri-Vakili Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Roxana Braga de Andrade Teles; Tâmara Coimbra Diniz; Tiago Coimbra Costa Pinto; Raimundo Gonçalves de Oliveira Júnior; Mariana Gama E Silva; Érica Martins de Lavor; Antonio Wilton Cavalcante Fernandes; Ana Paula de Oliveira; Fernanda Pires Rodrigues de Almeida Ribeiro; Amanda Alves Marcelino da Silva; Taisy Cinthia Ferro Cavalcante; Lucindo José Quintans Júnior; Jackson Roberto Guedes da Silva Almeida Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 6.543