Literature DB >> 19775044

The influence of gender and experience on intubation ability and technique: a manikin study.

M S Waddington1, M J Paech, I H S Kurowski, C J Reed, G J Nicholls, D T Guy, R E Day.   

Abstract

Female anaesthetists in early training commonly question whether their strength is adequate for tracheal intubation. This study investigated the influence of gender and experience on intubation ability and laryngoscopic technique. A manikin model and purpose-designed force-transducing laryngoscope was used to test three cohorts at different levels of experience (novice, intermediate and experienced males and females, n = 65) for the axial force and torque exerted, best laryngoscopic view obtained, success with and time for intubation and laryngoscopic technique. There were no significant differences between novice or experienced female and male intubators in markers of their ability to intubate or in the forces generated. For novice females compared with novice males, mean success rate was 90% (80.2 to 99.9) versus 97% (91.1 to 100, P = 0.29); and mean time to intubate 24 seconds (19 to 29 seconds) versus 18 seconds (14 to 21 seconds, P = 0.057). With experience, the forces generated during intubation reduced and ability improved. Proximal laryngoscope grips (close to the blade) generated lower forces than distal grips. Female and male intubators did not differ in ability to intubate or in the forces they exerted during direct laryngoscopy.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19775044     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0903700502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  7 in total

Review 1.  Gender differences in the acquisition of surgical skills: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amir Ali; Yousif Subhi; Charlotte Ringsted; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  An initial learning experience of tracheal intubation with video laryngoscope: Experiences from a novice PGY.

Authors:  Chai-Bae Shih; Yu-Hwa Wu; Chung-Ren Lin; Chia-Chih Alex Tseng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Comparison of five video-assisted intubation devices by novice and expert laryngoscopists for use in the aeromedical evacuation environment.

Authors:  Matthew C Wallace; SSgt Tyler Britton; Robbie Meek; Sharon Walsh-Hart; Col Todd E Carter; Steven J Lisco
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2017-06-14

4.  Influence of two-handed jaw thrust during tracheal intubation on postoperative sore throat: a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Hyub Huh; Doo Yeon Go; Jang Eun Cho; Jihoon Park; Jiwon Lee; Hyun-Chang Kim
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Mechanical strain to maxillary incisors during direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Milo Engoren; Lauryn R Rochlen; Matthew V Diehl; Sarah S Sherman; Elizabeth Jewell; Mary Golinski; Paul Begeman; John M Cavanaugh
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Comparison of Glidescope® Go™, King Vision™, Dahlhausen VL, I‑View™ and Macintosh laryngoscope use during difficult airway management simulation by experienced and inexperienced emergency medical staff: A randomized crossover manikin study.

Authors:  Andreas Moritz; Veronika Leonhardt; Johannes Prottengeier; Torsten Birkholz; Joachim Schmidt; Andrea Irouschek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator.

Authors:  Yuko Ono; Kazuaki Shinohara; Jiro Shimada; Shigeaki Inoue; Joji Kotani
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2020-05-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.