Literature DB >> 19770610

Operative versus nonoperative treatment of leg pain in adults with scoliosis: a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database with two-year follow-up.

Justin S Smith1, Christopher I Shaffrey, Sigurd Berven, Steven Glassman, Christopher Hamill, William Horton, Stephen Ondra, Frank Schwab, Michael Shainline, Kai-Ming G Fu, Keith Bridwell.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter study.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and severity of leg pain in adults with scoliosis and to assess whether surgery significantly improved leg pain compared with nonoperative management. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with adult scoliosis characteristically present with pain. The presence of leg pain is an independent predictor of a patient's choice for operative over nonoperative care.
METHODS: Data were extracted from a prospective, multicenter database for adult spinal deformity. At enrollment and follow-up, patients complete the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and assessment of leg pain using the numerical rating scale (NRS) score, with 0 and 10 representing no pain and unbearable pain, respectively. Plan for operative or nonoperative treatment was made at enrollment. The vast majority of adult scoliosis patients seen in our surgical clinics have received nonoperative therapies and are being seen for a surgical evaluation. Patients are counseled regarding operative and nonoperative management options and are in general encouraged to maximize nonoperative treatments.
RESULTS: Two hundred eight (64%) of 326 adults with scoliosis had leg pain at presentation (mean NRS score = 4.7). Ninety-six patients with leg pain (46%) were managed operatively and 112 were treated nonoperatively. The operative group had higher baseline mean NRS score for leg pain (5.4 vs. 4.1, P < 0.001) and higher mean ODI (41 vs. 30, P < 0.001). At 2-year follow-up, nonoperative patients had no significant change in ODI or NRS score for leg pain (P = 0.2). In contrast, at 2-year follow-up surgically treated patients had significant improvement in mean NRS score for leg pain (5.4 vs. 2.2, P < 0.001) and ODI (41 vs. 24, P < 0.001). Compared with nonsurgically treated patients, at 2-year follow-up operative patients had lower mean NRS score for leg pain (2.2 vs. 3.8, P < 0.001) and mean ODI (24 vs. 31, P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: Despite having started with significantly greater leg pain and disability, surgically treated patients at 2-year follow-up had significantly less leg pain and disability than nonoperatively treated patients. Surgical treatment has the potential to provide significant improvement of leg pain in adults with scoliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19770610     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ac5fcd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  35 in total

1.  Likelihood of reaching minimal clinically important difference in adult spinal deformity: a comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  Shian Liu; Frank Schwab; Justin S Smith; Eric Klineberg; Christopher P Ames; Gregory Mundis; Richard Hostin; Khaled Kebaish; Vedat Deviren; Munish Gupta; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Robert A Hart; Shay Bess; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

2.  Risk factors for major peri-operative complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: a multi-center review of 953 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Frank J Schwab; Nicola Hawkinson; Virginie Lafage; Justin S Smith; Robert Hart; Gregory Mundis; Douglas C Burton; Breton Line; Behrooz Akbarnia; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Richard Hostin; Christopher I Shaffrey; Vincent Arlet; Kirkham Wood; Munish Gupta; Shay Bess; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Predictors of inpatient morbidity and mortality in adult spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Nancy Worley; Bryan Marascalchi; Cyrus M Jalai; Sun Yang; Bassel Diebo; Shaleen Vira; Anthony Boniello; Virginie Lafage; Peter G Passias
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  De novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a systematic review of prognostic factors for curve progression.

Authors:  Sayf S A Faraj; Roderick M Holewijn; Miranda L van Hooff; Marinus de Kleuver; Ferran Pellisé; Tsjitske M Haanstra
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive, lateral, transpsoas approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Kaveh Khajavi; Alessandria Y Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Classification in Brief: SRS-Schwab Classification of Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Casey Slattery; Kushagra Verma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  [What is actually adult spinal deformity? : Development, classification, and indications for surgical treatment].

Authors:  D Adler; H Almansour; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  Realignment surgery in adult spinal deformity : Prevalence and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis.

Authors:  B G Diebo; N V Shah; S G Stroud; C B Paulino; F J Schwab; V Lafage
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 9.  Idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Per Trobisch; Olaf Suess; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Clinical and radiographic parameters that distinguish between the best and worst outcomes of scoliosis surgery for adults.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Steven D Glassman; Leah Y Carreon; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Vincent Arlet; Kai-Ming G Fu; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.