BACKGROUND: The neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays a key role in migraine pathophysiology. In this large phase 3 clinical trial, we sought to confirm the efficacy of telcagepant, the first orally bioavailable CGRP receptor antagonist. METHODS:Adults with migraine with or without aura (International Headache Society criteria) treated a moderate or severe attack withoral telcagepant 50 mg (n = 177), 150 mg (n = 381), 300 mg (n = 371), or placebo (n = 365) in a randomized, double-blind trial. The 5 co-primary endpoints were pain freedom, pain relief, and absence of photophobia, absence of phonophobia, and absence of nausea, all at 2 hours postdose. The key secondary endpoint was 2-24 hour sustained pain freedom. The prespecified primary efficacy analyses evaluated the 150 mg and 300 mg groups; the 50-mg group was included on an exploratory basis to further characterize the dose response but was not prespecified for analysis. Tolerability was assessed by adverse experience reports. RESULTS:Telcagepant 300 mg was more effective (p <or= 0.001) than placebo on all primary endpoints and the key secondary endpoint, as was telcagepant 150 mg (p <or= 0.05). Telcagepant 300 mg showed a slight numeric advantage over telcagepant 150 mg on most measures. Telcagepant 50 mg values were numerically intermediate between placebo and telcagepant 150 mg and 300 mg. The percentages of patients with adverse experiences were 32.2% for telcagepant 50 mg, 32.0% for telcagepant 150 mg, 36.2% for telcagepant 300 mg, and 32.2% for placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed previous findings that telcagepant 300 mg was effective at relieving pain and other migraine symptoms at 2 hours and providing sustained pain freedom up to 24 hours. In this study, telcagepant 150 mg was also effective. Telcagepant was generally well tolerated.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays a key role in migraine pathophysiology. In this large phase 3 clinical trial, we sought to confirm the efficacy of telcagepant, the first orally bioavailable CGRP receptor antagonist. METHODS: Adults with migraine with or without aura (International Headache Society criteria) treated a moderate or severe attack with oral telcagepant 50 mg (n = 177), 150 mg (n = 381), 300 mg (n = 371), or placebo (n = 365) in a randomized, double-blind trial. The 5 co-primary endpoints were pain freedom, pain relief, and absence of photophobia, absence of phonophobia, and absence of nausea, all at 2 hours postdose. The key secondary endpoint was 2-24 hour sustained pain freedom. The prespecified primary efficacy analyses evaluated the 150 mg and 300 mg groups; the 50-mg group was included on an exploratory basis to further characterize the dose response but was not prespecified for analysis. Tolerability was assessed by adverse experience reports. RESULTS:Telcagepant 300 mg was more effective (p <or= 0.001) than placebo on all primary endpoints and the key secondary endpoint, as was telcagepant 150 mg (p <or= 0.05). Telcagepant 300 mg showed a slight numeric advantage over telcagepant 150 mg on most measures. Telcagepant 50 mg values were numerically intermediate between placebo and telcagepant 150 mg and 300 mg. The percentages of patients with adverse experiences were 32.2% for telcagepant 50 mg, 32.0% for telcagepant 150 mg, 36.2% for telcagepant 300 mg, and 32.2% for placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed previous findings that telcagepant 300 mg was effective at relieving pain and other migraine symptoms at 2 hours and providing sustained pain freedom up to 24 hours. In this study, telcagepant 150 mg was also effective. Telcagepant was generally well tolerated.
Authors: David Dodick; Richard B Lipton; Vincent Martin; Vasilios Papademetriou; Wayne Rosamond; Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink; Hassan Loutfi; K Michael Welch; Peter J Goadsby; Steven Hahn; Susan Hutchinson; David Matchar; Stephen Silberstein; Timothy R Smith; R Allan Purdy; Jane Saiers Journal: Headache Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 5.887
Authors: Jes Olesen; Hans-Christoph Diener; Ingo W Husstedt; Peter J Goadsby; David Hall; Ulrich Meier; Stephane Pollentier; Lynna M Lesko Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-03-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tony W Ho; Michel D Ferrari; David W Dodick; Vince Galet; James Kost; Xiaoyin Fan; Heather Leibensperger; Samar Froman; Christopher Assaid; Christopher Lines; Hille Koppen; Paul K Winner Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-11-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Simon R Sinclair; Stefanie A Kane; Bart J Van der Schueren; Alan Xiao; Kenneth J Willson; Janet Boyle; Inge de Lepeleire; Yang Xu; Lisa Hickey; William S Denney; Chi-Chung Li; John Palcza; Floris H M Vanmolkot; Marleen Depré; Anne Van Hecken; M Gail Murphy; Tony W Ho; Jay N de Hoon Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.335