Literature DB >> 19768680

Comparative binding energy analysis for binding affinity and target selectivity prediction.

Stefan Henrich1, Isabella Feierberg, Ting Wang, Niklas Blomberg, Rebecca C Wade.   

Abstract

A major challenge in drug design is to obtain compounds that bind selectively to their target receptors and do not cause side-effects by binding to other similar receptors. Here, we investigate strategies for applying COMBINE (COMparative BINding Energy) analysis, in conjunction with PIPSA (Protein Interaction Property Similarity Analysis) and ligand docking methods, to address this problem. We evaluate these approaches by application to diverse sets of inhibitors of three structurally related serine proteases of medical relevance: thrombin, trypsin, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA). We generated target-specific scoring functions (COMBINE models) for the three targets using training sets of ligands with known inhibition constants and structures of their receptor-ligand complexes. These COMBINE models were compared with the PIPSA results and experimental data on receptor selectivity. These scoring functions highlight the ligand-receptor interactions that are particularly important for binding specificity for the different targets. To predict target selectivity in virtual screening, compounds were docked into the three protein binding sites using the program GOLD and the docking solutions were re-ranked with the target-specific scoring functions and computed electrostatic binding free energies. Limits in the accuracy of some of the docking solutions and difficulties in scoring them adversely affected the predictive ability of the target specific scoring functions. Nevertheless, the target-specific scoring functions enabled the selectivity of ligands to thrombin versus trypsin and uPA to be predicted. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19768680     DOI: 10.1002/prot.22579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  9 in total

Review 1.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Tuffery; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Sweet taste receptor gene variation and aspartame taste in primates and other species.

Authors:  Xia Li; Alexander A Bachmanov; Kenji Maehashi; Weihua Li; Raymond Lim; Joseph G Brand; Gary K Beauchamp; Danielle R Reed; Chloe Thai; Wely B Floriano
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Thiazole-Based Thiosemicarbazones: Synthesis, Cytotoxicity Evaluation and Molecular Docking Study.

Authors:  Sobhi M Gomha; Hyam A Abdelhady; Doaa Z H Hassain; Aboubakr H Abdelmonsef; Mohamed El-Naggar; Mahmoud M Elaasser; Huda K Mahmoud
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.162

4.  Predictions of Ligand Selectivity from Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Matteo Aldeghi; Alexander Heifetz; Michael J Bodkin; Stefan Knapp; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Micro-Environmental Signature of The Interactions between Druggable Target Protein, Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV, and Anti-Diabetic Drugs.

Authors:  Chiranjib Chakraborty; Bidyut Mallick; Ashish Ranjan Sharma; Garima Sharma; Supriya Jagga; C George Priya Doss; Ju-Suk Nam; Sang-Soo Lee
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.479

6.  Electrostatic recognition in substrate binding to serine proteases.

Authors:  Birgit J Waldner; Johannes Kraml; Ursula Kahler; Alexander Spinn; Michael Schauperl; Maren Podewitz; Julian E Fuchs; Gabriele Cruciani; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.137

7.  Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Is a Target Protein of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate.

Authors:  Huimin Hou; Ying Wang; Chunshi Li; Jian Wang; Yanli Cao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Exploring the binding of BACE-1 inhibitors using comparative binding energy analysis (COMBINE).

Authors:  Shu Liu; Rao Fu; Xiao Cheng; Sheng-Ping Chen; Li-Hua Zhou
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2012-08-27

9.  Synthesis, In Silico and In Vitro Assessment of New Quinazolinones as Anticancer Agents via Potential AKT Inhibition.

Authors:  Ahmed A Noser; Mohamed El-Naggar; Thoria Donia; Aboubakr H Abdelmonsef
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.