Literature DB >> 19767699

Polyurethane and PTFE membranes for guided bone regeneration: histopathological and ultrastructural evaluation.

Adriana-Socorro-Ferreira Monteiro1, Luís-Guilherme-Scavone Macedo, Nelson-Luiz Macedo, Ivan Balducci.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to research a membrane material for use in guided bone regeneration. STUDY
DESIGN: In this study, 25 male Wistar rats were used to analyze the biocompatibility and degradation process of biomembranes. The morphological changes in subcutaneous implantations were assessed after 7, 14, 21, 28 and 70 days. The materials were made of polyurethane polymer (AUG) obtained from vegetal oil (Ricinus communis) and polytetrafluoroethylene membrane (PTFE). The surface characteristics of the physical barriers in scanning electronic microscopic (SEM) were also evaluated.
RESULTS: In both groups, the initial histological analysis showed moderate inflammatory infiltrate, which was predominantly polymorphonuclear. There was also a presence of edema, which was gradually replaced by granulation tissue, culminating in a fibrous capsule. In the AUG group, some multinucleated giant cells were present in the contact interface, with the space previously occupied by the material. However, membrane degradation was not observed during the period studied. According to the present SEM findings, porosity was not detected in the AUG or PTFE membranes.
CONCLUSION: The researched material is biocompatible and the degradation process is extremely slow or may not even occur at all.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19767699     DOI: 10.4317/medoral.15.e401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal        ISSN: 1698-4447


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of the performance of natural latex membranes prepared with different procedures and PTFE membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR) in rabbits.

Authors:  Jonas M L Moura; Juliana F Ferreira; Leonardo Marques; Leandro Holgado; Carlos F O Graeff; Angela Kinoshita
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Bone augmentation in rabbit tibia using microfixed cobalt-chromium membranes with whole blood, tricalcium phosphate and bone marrow cells.

Authors:  Oscar Decco; Andrea Cura; Víctor Beltrán; María Lezcano; Wilfried Engelke
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

3.  Management of the exposure of a dense PTFE (d-PTFE) membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR): a case report.

Authors:  P Ghensi; W Stablum; E Bettio; M C Soldini; T R Tripi; C Soldini
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-11-30

4.  Horizontal bone augmentation using two membranes at dehisced implant sites: A randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Rakhshinda Nahid; Monika Bansal; Samidha Pandey
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-06-11

5.  A castor oil-containing dental luting agent: effects of cyclic loading and storage time on flexural strength.

Authors:  Juliana Dos Reis Derceli; Laiza Maria Grassi Fais; Lígia Antunes Pereira Pinelli
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Diametral tensile strength and film thickness of an experimental dental luting agent derived from castor oil.

Authors:  Juliana Cabrini Carmello; Laiza Maria Grassi Fais; Lígia Nunes de Moraes Ribeiro; Salvador Claro Neto; Dalton Geraldo Guaglianoni; Lígia Antunes Pereira Pinelli
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  A comparison of mandibular and maxillary alveolar osteogenesis over six weeks: a radiological examination.

Authors:  Marthinus J Kotze; Kurt-W Bütow; Steve A Olorunju; Harry F Kotze
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Localized ridge augmentation in the anterior maxilla using titanium mesh, an alloplast, and a nano-bone graft: a case report.

Authors:  Adel S Alagl; Marwa Madi
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Tadas Korzinskas; Ole Jung; Ralf Smeets; Sanja Stojanovic; Stevo Najman; Kristina Glenske; Michael Hahn; Sabine Wenisch; Reinhard Schnettler; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Emdogain effect on gingival fibroblast adhesion in bioabsorbable and non-resorbable barrier membranes: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Mehrdad Barekatain; Morvarid Mafi; Shirin Amini; Shirin Zahra Farhad
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.