| Literature DB >> 25591018 |
Juliana Dos Reis Derceli1, Laiza Maria Grassi Fais2, Lígia Antunes Pereira Pinelli2.
Abstract
Favorable results in the use of castor oil polyurethane (COP) as pulp capping, membrane material, sealer, mouthwash and in bone repair, associated with the fact that Ricinus communis is not derived from petroleum and it is abundant in Brazil, encourage researches in the development of luting agents. Objectives This study compared the flexural strength (FS) of a castor oil-containing dental luting agent with a weight percentage of 10% (wt%) of calcium carbonate (COP10) with RelyX ARC (RX) after mechanical cycling (MC) and distilled water storage. Material and Methods Sixty-four specimens (25x2x2 mm) were fabricated and divided into two groups, COP10 and RX (control). Each group was divided into 4 subgroups (n=8) according to the storage time, 24 hours (24 h) or 60 days (60 d), and the performance (MC+FS) or not (only FS) of the mechanical cycling test. The FS (10 kN; 0.5 mm/min) and MC tests (10,000 cycles, 5 Hz, 0.5 mm/min) were carried out using an MTS-810 machine. The data were analyzed using ANOVA (α=0.05). Results The obtained FS (MPa) values were: COP10 24h- 19.04±2.41; COP10 60d- 17.92±3.54; RX 24h- 75.19±3.43; RX 60d- 88.77±6.89. All the RX specimens submitted to MC fractured, while the values for COP10 after MC were as follows: COP10 24h- 17.90±1.87 and COP10 60d- 18.60±1.60. Conclusions A castor oil-containing dental luting agent with a weight percentage of 10% (wt%) of calcium carbonate is resistant to mechanical cycling without decreases in flexural strength. However, mean COP10 showed only about 25% of the RelyX ARC mean flexural strength.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25591018 PMCID: PMC4307762 DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720140069
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Oral Sci ISSN: 1678-7757 Impact factor: 2.698
Figure 1Flow chart of the study
Means (MPa) and standard deviations of flexural strength values of luting agents according to storage time and performance of mechanical cycling test
| COP10 | RX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 hours | 60 days | 24 hours | 60 days | |
| Without mechanical cycling | 19.04±2.41a | 17.92±3.54a | 75.19±3.43b | 88.77±6.89c |
| With mechanical cycling | 17.90±1.87a | 18.60±1.60a | * | * |
Specimens did not resist the mechanical cycling
Identical superscript letters were not significantly different