Literature DB >> 19767544

Comparison of male and female foot shape.

Gangming Luo1, Vern L Houston, Martin Mussman, Maryanne Garbarini, Aaron C Beattie, Chaiya Thongpop.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Morphological and geometric differences between male and female feet can be the decisive factor of whether well-fitting, functional, and comfortable footwear is available for both men and women.
METHODS: Optical scans, plaster wrap casts, and a set of manual measurements from the right feet of 51 female participants, aged 20 to 59 years (32 +/- 10.2 years), and 39 male participants, aged 22 to 71 years (47.1 +/- 12.1 years), were taken to determine which parameters were the most significant in characterizing pedal geometry and which had the largest difference between male and female feet.
RESULTS: Analysis showed that the heel-to-ball length (ball length) of the male participants' feet (181.5 mm) was significantly longer, on average, than that of the female participants' feet (165.0 mm). The width of the male paticipants' feet at the ball, instep, and heel regions, as well as the ball circumference, normalized by the ball length, were all significantly larger on average, than the female test participants' feet. However, toe region, instep, and medial and lateral malleoli heights were larger, on average, for the female participants than for the male. The results show that female feet differ in size and shape from male feet and are not algebraically scaled, smaller versions of male feet, as is often assumed.
CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the average male participants' feet are longer than that of the female participants' feet, while the female feet are relatively narrower but higher than those of the male participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19767544     DOI: 10.7547/0990383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc        ISSN: 1930-8264


  6 in total

1.  The use of 3D surface scanning for the measurement and assessment of the human foot.

Authors:  Scott Telfer; James Woodburn
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2010-09-05       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Custom-made foot orthoses: an analysis of prescription characteristics from an Australian commercial orthotic laboratory.

Authors:  Hylton B Menz; Jamie J Allan; Daniel R Bonanno; Karl B Landorf; George S Murley
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  The inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Maestro and Barroco metatarsal length measurement techniques.

Authors:  Zainab Ali; Hassan Karim; Navid Wali; Reza Naraghi
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Internal environment of footwear is a risk factor for tinea pedis.

Authors:  Yukio Sasagawa
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.005

5.  Semi-automatic measurements of foot morphological parameters from 3D plantar foot scans.

Authors:  Giulia Rogati; Alberto Leardini; Maurizio Ortolani; Paolo Caravaggi
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Foot deformation analysis with different load-bearing conditions to enhance diabetic footwear designs.

Authors:  Liying Zhang; Kit-Lun Yick; Pui-Ling Li; Joanne Yip; Sun-Pui Ng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.