Literature DB >> 19767232

Large sizes of vertebral body replacement do not reduce the contact pressure on adjacent vertebral bodies per se.

Thomas Zander1, Georg Bergmann, Antonius Rohlmann.   

Abstract

Large implants for vertebral body replacement (VBR) have a large footprint, and are normally supported by stronger bone at the rim of the vertebral body. But they also necessitate a greater corpectomy defect in the vertebral body concerned. In order to study the effect of implant size on contact pressure on the adjacent vertebral bodies and thus the risk of implant subsidence, an osseoligamentous finite element model of the lumbar spine was employed. The VBR was inserted at the level of L4 and additionally stabilized by posterior spinal instrumentation. Flat and curved vertebral endplates, small and large corpectomy defects, different implant positions and axial preloads as well as normal and osteoporotic vertebral bodies were simulated. Contact pressures in the vertebral body are increased for a curved vertebral endplate in comparison with a flat one, they are increased when an additional implant preload was assumed, and they are usually decreased for an osteoporotic vertebra when compared to a non-osteoporotic one. In some cases the average contact pressures were higher for the small-sized VBR, in others for the large-sized one. Our results reveal that from the mechanical point of view, a small-sized VBR is not generally disadvantageous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19767232     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  2 in total

1.  Loads on a spinal implant measured in vivo during whole-body vibration.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Barbara Hinz; Ralph Blüthner; Friedmar Graichen; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanics of artificial pedicle fixation in a 3D-printed prosthesis after total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Xiaodong Wang; Hanpeng Xu; Ye Han; Jincheng Wu; Yang Song; Yuanyuan Jiang; Jianzhong Wang; Jun Miao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.