PURPOSE: To demonstrate the theoretical feasibility of [(11)C]acetate PET/CT in delineating the malignant intraprostatic lesions (IPL's) in prostate cancer and to use the data in external beam radiotherapy to boost the biologically defined target volume (BTV). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve men with intracapsular prostate carcinoma were imaged with [(11)C]acetate PET/CT and the data were used to delineate the BTV. Six dynamic IMRT plans were generated to each patient: a standard IMRT (sIMRT) plan with a 77.9 Gy dose to PTV (prostate gland with a 6-mm margin) and a simultaneous integrated boost IMRT (SIB(IMRT)) plan to deliver 77.9 Gy, 81 Gy, 84 Gy, 87 Gy and 90 Gy to the BTV and 72 Gy to the rest of PTV. To study the theoretical dose escalation based on the delineation of BTV, tumor control probabilities (TCPs) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) of bladder and rectum were calculated and compared between the treatment plans. RESULTS: [(11)C]Acetate was used to delineate the IPL's of all 12 patients. With every patient the TCP was increased with SIB(IMRT) without increasing the NTCP of the bladder or rectum. The probability of uncomplicated control (PUC) was increased on average by 28% with the SIB(IMRT) treatment plans. The highest PUC was achieved with an average dose of 82.1 Gy to the BTV. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that [(11)C]acetate can be used to define the IPL's and in combination with SIB(IMRT) the defined areas can theoretically be treated to ultra high doses without increasing the treatment toxicity. These results motivate the formal validation of [(11)C]acetate PET for biological dose planning in prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the theoretical feasibility of [(11)C]acetate PET/CT in delineating the malignant intraprostatic lesions (IPL's) in prostate cancer and to use the data in external beam radiotherapy to boost the biologically defined target volume (BTV). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve men with intracapsular prostate carcinoma were imaged with [(11)C]acetate PET/CT and the data were used to delineate the BTV. Six dynamic IMRT plans were generated to each patient: a standard IMRT (sIMRT) plan with a 77.9 Gy dose to PTV (prostate gland with a 6-mm margin) and a simultaneous integrated boost IMRT (SIB(IMRT)) plan to deliver 77.9 Gy, 81 Gy, 84 Gy, 87 Gy and 90 Gy to the BTV and 72 Gy to the rest of PTV. To study the theoretical dose escalation based on the delineation of BTV, tumor control probabilities (TCPs) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) of bladder and rectum were calculated and compared between the treatment plans. RESULTS:[(11)C]Acetate was used to delineate the IPL's of all 12 patients. With every patient the TCP was increased with SIB(IMRT) without increasing the NTCP of the bladder or rectum. The probability of uncomplicated control (PUC) was increased on average by 28% with the SIB(IMRT) treatment plans. The highest PUC was achieved with an average dose of 82.1 Gy to the BTV. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that [(11)C]acetate can be used to define the IPL's and in combination with SIB(IMRT) the defined areas can theoretically be treated to ultra high doses without increasing the treatment toxicity. These results motivate the formal validation of [(11)C]acetate PET for biological dose planning in prostate cancer.
Authors: Max Kiugel; Ingrid Dijkgraaf; Ville Kytö; Semi Helin; Heidi Liljenbäck; Tiina Saanijoki; Cheng-Bin Yim; Vesa Oikonen; Pekka Saukko; Juhani Knuuti; Anne Roivainen; Antti Saraste Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Kirsten Bouchelouche; Scott T Tagawa; Stanley J Goldsmith; Baris Turkbey; Jacek Capala; Peter Choyke Journal: Semin Nucl Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.446
Authors: Michael Pinkawa; Richard Holy; Marc D Piroth; Jens Klotz; Sandra Nussen; Thomas Krohn; Felix M Mottaghy; Martin Weibrecht; Michael J Eble Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 3.621