PURPOSE: Since meningiomas show a high expression of somatostatin receptor subtype 2, PET with (68)Ga-DOTATOC was proposed as an additional imaging modality beside CT and MRI for planning radiotherapy. We investigated the input of (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT on the definition of the "gross tumour volume" (GTV) in meningiomas, in order to assess the potential value of this method. METHODS: Prior to radiotherapy, 42 patients with meningiomas (26 f, 16 m, mean age 55) underwent MRI and (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT examinations. HISTORY: operated n = 24, radiotherapy n = 1, operation and radiotherapy n = 8, no treatment n = 9. PET/CT and MRI data were co-registered using a BrainLAB workstation. For comparison, the GTV was defined first under consideration of CT and MRI data, then using PET data. RESULTS: 3/42 patients were excluded from the analysis (two with negative PET results, one with an extensive tumour, not precisely delineable by MRI or PET/CT). The average GTV(CT/MRI) was 22(+/-19)cm(3); GTV(PET) was 23(+/-20)cm(3). Additional GTV, obtained as a result of PET was 9(+/-10)cm(3) and was observed in patients with osseous infiltration. In some pre-treated patients there were intratumoural areas (as identified in CT/MRI) without SR-expression (7(+/-11)cm(3)). Common GTV as obtained by both CT/MRI and PET was 15(+/-14)cm(3). The mean bi-directional difference between the GTV(CT/MRI) and GTV(PET) accounted to 16(+/-15)cm(3) (93%, p < 0.001). In a subgroup of seven patients with multiple meningiomas, PET showed a total of 19 lesions; nine of them were not recognizable by CT or MRI. CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET enables delineation of SR-positive meningiomas and delivers additional information to both CT and MRI regarding the planning of stereotactic radiotherapy. The acquisition on a PET/CT scanner helps to estimate the relation of PET findings to anatomical structures and is especially useful for detection of osseous infiltration. (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET also allows detection of additional lesions in patients with multiple meningiomas.
PURPOSE: Since meningiomas show a high expression of somatostatin receptor subtype 2, PET with (68)Ga-DOTATOC was proposed as an additional imaging modality beside CT and MRI for planning radiotherapy. We investigated the input of (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT on the definition of the "gross tumour volume" (GTV) in meningiomas, in order to assess the potential value of this method. METHODS: Prior to radiotherapy, 42 patients with meningiomas (26 f, 16 m, mean age 55) underwent MRI and (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT examinations. HISTORY: operated n = 24, radiotherapy n = 1, operation and radiotherapy n = 8, no treatment n = 9. PET/CT and MRI data were co-registered using a BrainLAB workstation. For comparison, the GTV was defined first under consideration of CT and MRI data, then using PET data. RESULTS: 3/42 patients were excluded from the analysis (two with negative PET results, one with an extensive tumour, not precisely delineable by MRI or PET/CT). The average GTV(CT/MRI) was 22(+/-19)cm(3); GTV(PET) was 23(+/-20)cm(3). Additional GTV, obtained as a result of PET was 9(+/-10)cm(3) and was observed in patients with osseous infiltration. In some pre-treated patients there were intratumoural areas (as identified in CT/MRI) without SR-expression (7(+/-11)cm(3)). Common GTV as obtained by both CT/MRI and PET was 15(+/-14)cm(3). The mean bi-directional difference between the GTV(CT/MRI) and GTV(PET) accounted to 16(+/-15)cm(3) (93%, p < 0.001). In a subgroup of seven patients with multiple meningiomas, PET showed a total of 19 lesions; nine of them were not recognizable by CT or MRI. CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET enables delineation of SR-positive meningiomas and delivers additional information to both CT and MRI regarding the planning of stereotactic radiotherapy. The acquisition on a PET/CT scanner helps to estimate the relation of PET findings to anatomical structures and is especially useful for detection of osseous infiltration. (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET also allows detection of additional lesions in patients with multiple meningiomas.
Authors: Anca-Ligia Grosu; Wolfgang A Weber; Sabrina T Astner; Markus Adam; Bernd J Krause; Markus Schwaiger; Michael Molls; Carsten Nieder Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-06-09 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Sabrina T Astner; Mihaela Dobrei-Ciuchendea; Markus Essler; Ralf A Bundschuh; Heitetsu Sai; Markus Schwaiger; Michael Molls; Wolfgang A Weber; Anca-Ligia Grosu Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-04-25 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: N Tomura; H Hirano; R Sashi; M Hashimoto; K Kato; S Takahashi; O Watanabe; J Watarai Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph Date: 1998 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Martha Nowosielski; Norbert Galldiks; Sarah Iglseder; Philipp Kickingereder; Andreas von Deimling; Martin Bendszus; Wolfgang Wick; Felix Sahm Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Norbert Galldiks; Nathalie L Albert; Michael Sommerauer; Anca L Grosu; Ute Ganswindt; Ian Law; Matthias Preusser; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael A Vogelbaum; Gelareh Zadeh; Frédéric Dhermain; Michael Weller; Karl-Josef Langen; Jörg C Tonn Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Kerstin A Kessel; Wolfgang Weber; Igor Yakushev; Hanna Fischer; Theresa Voglhuber; Christian Diehl; Christoph Straube; Claus Zimmer; Benedikt Wiestler; Jens Gempt; Bernhard Meyer; Stephanie E Combs Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Reinhold Graf; Michail Plotkin; Ingo G Steffen; Reinhard Wurm; Peter Wust; Winfried Brenner; Volker Budach; Harun Badakhshi Journal: Head Face Med Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 2.151
Authors: Constantin Lapa; Ursula Nestle; Nathalie L Albert; Christian Baues; Ambros Beer; Andreas Buck; Volker Budach; Rebecca Bütof; Stephanie E Combs; Thorsten Derlin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Christian Furth; Cihan Gani; Eleni Gkika; Anca-L Grosu; Christoph Henkenberens; Harun Ilhan; Steffen Löck; Simone Marnitz-Schulze; Matthias Miederer; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Maximilian Niyazi; Christoph Pöttgen; Claus M Rödel; Imke Schatka; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Andrei S Todica; Wolfgang Weber; Simone Wegen; Thomas Wiegel; Constantinos Zamboglou; Daniel Zips; Klaus Zöphel; Sebastian Zschaeck; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 3.621