PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of 11C-methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET) in target volume delineation for meningiomas and to determine the interobserver variability. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two independent observers performed treatment planning in 10 patients according to a prospective written protocol. In the first step, they used coregistered computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the second step, MET-PET was added to CT/MRI (image fusion based on mutual information). RESULTS: The correlation between gross tumor volume (GTVs) delineated by the two observers based on CT/MRI was r=0.855 (Spearman's correlation coefficient, p=0.002) and r=0.988 (p=0.000) when MET-PET/CT/MRI were used. The number of patients with agreement in more then 80% of the outlined volume increased with the availability of MET-PET from 1 in 10 to 5 in 10. The median volume of intersection between the regions delineated by two observers increased significantly from 69% (from the composite volume) to 79%, by the addition of MET-PET (p=0.005). The information of MET-PET was useful to delineate GTV in the area of cavernous sinus, orbit, and base of the skull. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis-generating findings of potential normal tissue sparing and reduced interobserver variability provide arguments for invasive studies of the correlation between MET-PET images and histologic tumor extension and for prospective trials of target volume delineation with CT/MRI/MET-PET image fusion.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of 11C-methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET) in target volume delineation for meningiomas and to determine the interobserver variability. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two independent observers performed treatment planning in 10 patients according to a prospective written protocol. In the first step, they used coregistered computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the second step, MET-PET was added to CT/MRI (image fusion based on mutual information). RESULTS: The correlation between gross tumor volume (GTVs) delineated by the two observers based on CT/MRI was r=0.855 (Spearman's correlation coefficient, p=0.002) and r=0.988 (p=0.000) when MET-PET/CT/MRI were used. The number of patients with agreement in more then 80% of the outlined volume increased with the availability of MET-PET from 1 in 10 to 5 in 10. The median volume of intersection between the regions delineated by two observers increased significantly from 69% (from the composite volume) to 79%, by the addition of MET-PET (p=0.005). The information of MET-PET was useful to delineate GTV in the area of cavernous sinus, orbit, and base of the skull. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis-generating findings of potential normal tissue sparing and reduced interobserver variability provide arguments for invasive studies of the correlation between MET-PET images and histologic tumor extension and for prospective trials of target volume delineation with CT/MRI/MET-PET image fusion.
Authors: Martha Nowosielski; Norbert Galldiks; Sarah Iglseder; Philipp Kickingereder; Andreas von Deimling; Martin Bendszus; Wolfgang Wick; Felix Sahm Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Guido Lammering; Dirk De Ruysscher; Angela van Baardwijk; Brigitta G Baumert; Jacques Borger; Ludy Lutgens; Piet van den Ende; Michel Ollers; Philippe Lambin Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2010-08-30 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Jan F Cornelius; Gabriele Stoffels; Christian Filß; Norbert Galldiks; Philipp Slotty; Marcel Kamp; Mustafa el Khatib; Daniel Hänggi; Michael Sabel; Jörg Felsberg; Hans Jakob Steiger; Heinz H Coenen; Nadim J Shah; Karl-Josef Langen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Norbert Galldiks; Roland Ullrich; Michael Schroeter; Gereon R Fink; Andreas H Jacobs; Lutz W Kracht Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Barbara Gehler; Frank Paulsen; Mehmet O Oksüz; Till-Karsten Hauser; Susanne M Eschmann; Roland Bares; Christina Pfannenberg; Michael Bamberg; Peter Bartenstein; Claus Belka; Ute Ganswindt Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 3.481