Literature DB >> 19763518

Planning and executing a genome wide association study (GWAS).

Michèle M Sale1, Josyf C Mychaleckyj, Wei-Min Chen.   

Abstract

In recent years, genome-wide association approaches have proven a powerful and successful strategy to identify genetic contributors to complex traits, including a number of endocrine disorders. Their success has meant that genome wide association studies (GWAS) are fast becoming the default study design for discovery of new genetic variants that influence a clinical trait or phenotype. This chapter focuses on a number of key elements that require consideration for the successful conduct of a GWAS. Although many of the considerations are common to any genetic study, the greater cost, extreme multiple testing, and greater openness to data sharing require specific awareness and planning by investigators. In the section on designing a GWAS, we reflect on ethical considerations, study design, selection of phenotype/s, power considerations, sample tracking and storage issues, and genotyping product selection. During execution, important considerations include DNA quantity and preparation, genotyping methods, quality control checks of genotype data, in silico genotyping (imputation), tests of association, and replication of association signals. Although the field of human genetics is rapidly evolving, recent experiences can help guide an investigator in making practical and methodological choices that will eventually determine the overall quality of GWAS results. Given the investment to recruit patient populations or cohorts that are powered for a GWAS, and the still substantial costs associated with genotyping, it is helpful to be aware of these aspects to maximize the likelihood of success, especially where there is an opportunity for implementing them prospectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19763518     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-378-7_25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  10 in total

1.  A Simple Scalable Association Hypothesis Test Combining Gene-wide Evidence From Multiple Polymorphisms.

Authors:  Dhananjay Vaidya; Lisa R Yanek; Rasika A Mathias; Taryn F Moy; Diane M Becker; Lewis C Becker
Journal:  Br J Med Med Res       Date:  2014-03

2.  Advancing the biobehavioral research of fatigue with genetics and genomics.

Authors:  Debra E Lyon; Nancy L McCain; Rita H Pickler; Cindy Munro; R K Elswick
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.176

Review 3.  Systems biology of kidney diseases.

Authors:  John Cijiang He; Peter Y Chuang; Avi Ma'ayan; Ravi Iyengar
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Big data challenges in bone research: genome-wide association studies and next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Nerea Alonso; Gavin Lucas; Pirro Hysi
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-02-11

5.  Population based allele frequencies of disease associated polymorphisms in the Personalized Medicine Research Project.

Authors:  Deanna S Cross; Lynn C Ivacic; Elisha L Stefanski; Catherine A McCarty
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Development of a genotyping microarray for studying the role of gene-environment interactions in risk for lung cancer.

Authors:  Don A Baldwin; Christopher P Sarnowski; Sabrina A Reddy; Ian A Blair; Margie Clapper; Philip Lazarus; Mingyao Li; Joshua E Muscat; Trevor M Penning; Anil Vachani; Alexander S Whitehead
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2013-12

7.  Naturalistic Experimental Designs as Tools for Understanding the Role of Genes and the Environment in Prevention Research.

Authors:  Leslie D Leve; Jenae M Neiderhiser; Gordon T Harold; Misaki N Natsuaki; Brendan J M Bohannan; William A Cresko
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2018-01

8.  Buffy coat specimens remain viable as a DNA source for highly multiplexed genome-wide genetic tests after long term storage.

Authors:  Josyf C Mychaleckyj; Emily A Farber; Jessica Chmielewski; Jamie Artale; Laney S Light; Donald W Bowden; Xuanlin Hou; Santica M Marcovina
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Sources of pre-analytical variations in yield of DNA extracted from blood samples: analysis of 50,000 DNA samples in EPIC.

Authors:  Elodie Caboux; Christophe Lallemand; Gilles Ferro; Bertrand Hémon; Maimuna Mendy; Carine Biessy; Matt Sims; Nick Wareham; Abigail Britten; Anne Boland; Amy Hutchinson; Afshan Siddiq; Paolo Vineis; Elio Riboli; Isabelle Romieu; Sabina Rinaldi; Marc J Gunter; Petra H M Peeters; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Ruth Travis; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Federico Canzian; Maria-José Sánchez; Guri Skeie; Karina Standahl Olsen; Eiliv Lund; Roberto Bilbao; Núria Sala; Aurelio Barricarte; Domenico Palli; Carmen Navarro; Salvatore Panico; Maria Luisa Redondo; Silvia Polidoro; Laure Dossus; Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Antonia Trichopoulou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Pagona Lagiou; Heiner Boeing; Eva Fisher; Rosario Tumino; Claudia Agnoli; Pierre Hainaut
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Web tools to perform long non-coding RNAs analysis in oncology research.

Authors:  Shixing Gu; Guangjie Zhang; Qin Si; Jiawen Dai; Zhen Song; Yingshuang Wang
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.451

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.