Literature DB >> 19762839

Fatty acid intake and milk fatty acid composition of Holstein dairy cows under different grazing strategies: herbage mass and daily herbage allowance.

R A Palladino1, M O'Donovan, J J Murphy, M McEvoy, J Callan, T M Boland, D A Kenny.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of level of 1) pregrazing herbage mass (HM) and 2) level of daily herbage allowance (DHA) on the performance and fatty acid (FA) composition of milk from grazing dairy cows. Sixty-eight Holstein-Friesian dairy cows were allocated to either a high or low pregrazing HM (1,700 vs. 2,400 kg of DM/ha; >40 mm), and within HM treatment, cows were further allocated to either a high or low DHA (16 vs. 20 kg of DM/d per cow; >40 mm) in a 2 x 2 factorial design. Pregrazing HM did not affect dry matter intake (17.5 +/- 0.75 kg/d), milk production (22.1 +/- 0.99 kg/d), milk composition (milk fat, 3.88 +/- 0.114%; milk protein, 3.28 +/- 0.051%), body weight (525 +/- 16 kg), or body condition score (2.65 +/- 0.064). Increasing DHA increased dry matter intake (+1.5 kg/d) but did not affect any other variable measured. Cows grazing the low HM or high DHA had a higher daily intake of total FA (+0.12 and +0.09 kg/d, respectively, for the low HM and high DHA), alpha-linolenic acid (LNA; +0.08 and +0.05 kg/d, respectively, for the low HM and high DHA), and linoleic acid (+0.01 for both the low HM and high DHA) compared with either the high HM or low DHA. Milk conjugated linoleic acid (cis-9, trans-11 isomer) was not affected by treatment (13.0 +/- 0.77 g/kg of total FA); however, large variation was recorded between individual animals (range from 5.9 to 20.6 g/kg of total FA). Milk concentrations of LNA were higher for animals offered the low HM (5.3 g/kg of total FA), but across treatments, milk concentrations of LNA were low (4.9 +/- 0.33 g/kg of total FA). The present study indicates that changes in HM and DHA do not have a great effect on the milk FA composition of grazing dairy cows. Further enhancement of the beneficial FA content in milk purely from changes in grazing strategy may be difficult when pasture quality is already high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19762839     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of milk fatty acid profiles measured on Kouri cows near Lake Chad and on dairy cattle as reported by meta-analytical data.

Authors:  O Bada Algom; C Fabry; P L Leroy; J-L Hornick
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 2.  Role of Fatty Acids in Milk Fat and the Influence of Selected Factors on Their Variability-A Review.

Authors:  Oto Hanuš; Eva Samková; Ludmila Křížová; Lucie Hasoňová; Robert Kala
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Feed Intake, Methane Emissions, Milk Production and Rumen Methanogen Populations of Grazing Dairy Cows Supplemented with Various C 18 Fatty Acid Sources.

Authors:  Tommy M Boland; Karina M Pierce; Alan K Kelly; David A Kenny; Mary B Lynch; Sinéad M Waters; Stephen J Whelan; Zoe C McKay
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.