Literature DB >> 19762196

Evidence for daptomycin Etest lot-related MIC elevations for Staphylococcus aureus.

Lawrence Friedrich1, Grace Thorne, Judith N Steenbergen, Diane Anastasiou, Laura Koeth.   

Abstract

MIC testing was performed simultaneously by Etest and broth microdilution (BMD) on 587 Staphylococcus aureus isolates submitted by local laboratories to a reference laboratory for confirmatory testing (May 2005 to July 2008). Testing bias was assessed for Etest to BMD MIC ratios. Categoric and essential agreement, very major (BMD nonsusceptible, Etest susceptible), and major (BMD susceptible, Etest nonsusceptible) errors were evaluated. Agar and broth calcium concentrations were consistent with current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and manufacturer recommendations. There was a consistent bias for higher Etest MIC values compared with BMD. Ratios ranged from 0.25 to 4 (average 1.3), with substantial variability noted among the 8 different Etest lots tested. Overall, 6% of all ratios were >2.0. Categoric agreement and essential agreement among the 8 Etest lots ranged from 73% to 96% and 74% to 100%, respectively; very major errors ranged from 3% to 9%, and major errors ranged from 6% to 35%. However, most of the discrepancies were limited to 3 Etest lots.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19762196     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  4 in total

1.  False daptomycin-nonsusceptible MIC results by Microscan panel PC 29 relative to Etest results for Staphylococcus aureus and enterococci.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Palavecino; Jacqueline M Burnell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of commercial antimicrobial susceptibility test methods for testing of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococci against vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid.

Authors:  Stefan Riedel; Kar Mun Neoh; Stephen W Eisinger; Lisa M Dam; Tsigereda Tekle; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  A current perspective on daptomycin for the clinical microbiologist.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Simon Pollett; George Sakoulas
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Rapid Phenotypic Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Uropathogens Using Optical Signal Analysis on the Nanowell Slide.

Authors:  Marta Veses-Garcia; Haris Antypas; Susanne Löffler; Annelie Brauner; Helene Andersson-Svahn; Agneta Richter-Dahlfors
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 5.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.