BACKGROUND: Currently, tumor grade is the best predictor of outcome at first presentation of noninvasive papillary (Ta) bladder cancer. However, reliable predictors of Ta tumor recurrence and progression for individual patients, which could optimize treatment and follow-up schedules based on specific tumor biology, are yet to be identified. OBJECTIVE: To identify genes predictive for recurrence and progression in Ta bladder cancer at first presentation using a quantitative, pathway-specific approach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective study of patients with Ta G2/3 bladder tumors at initial presentation with three distinct clinical outcomes: absence of recurrence (n=16), recurrence without progression (n=16), and progression to carcinoma in situ or invasive disease (n=16). MEASUREMENTS: Expressions of 24 genes that feature in relevant pathways that are deregulated in bladder cancer were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction on tumor biopsies from the patients at initial presentation. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: CCND3 (p=0.003) and HRAS (p=0.01) were predictive for recurrence by univariate analysis. In a multivariable model based on CCND3 expression, sensitivity and specificity for recurrence were 97% and 63%, respectively. HRAS (p<0.001), E2F1 (p=0.017), BIRC5/Survivin (p=0.038), and VEGFR2 (p=0.047) were predictive for progression by univariate analysis. Multivariable analysis based on HRAS, VEGFR2, and VEGF identified progression with 81% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Since this is a small retrospective study using medium-throughput profiling, larger confirmatory studies are needed. CONCLUSIONS: Gene expression profiling across relevant cancer pathways appears to be a promising approach for Ta bladder tumor outcome prediction at initial diagnosis. These results could help differentiate between patients who need aggressive versus expectant management.
BACKGROUND: Currently, tumor grade is the best predictor of outcome at first presentation of noninvasive papillary (Ta) bladder cancer. However, reliable predictors of Ta tumor recurrence and progression for individual patients, which could optimize treatment and follow-up schedules based on specific tumor biology, are yet to be identified. OBJECTIVE: To identify genes predictive for recurrence and progression in Ta bladder cancer at first presentation using a quantitative, pathway-specific approach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective study of patients with Ta G2/3 bladder tumors at initial presentation with three distinct clinical outcomes: absence of recurrence (n=16), recurrence without progression (n=16), and progression to carcinoma in situ or invasive disease (n=16). MEASUREMENTS: Expressions of 24 genes that feature in relevant pathways that are deregulated in bladder cancer were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction on tumor biopsies from the patients at initial presentation. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: CCND3 (p=0.003) and HRAS (p=0.01) were predictive for recurrence by univariate analysis. In a multivariable model based on CCND3 expression, sensitivity and specificity for recurrence were 97% and 63%, respectively. HRAS (p<0.001), E2F1 (p=0.017), BIRC5/Survivin (p=0.038), and VEGFR2 (p=0.047) were predictive for progression by univariate analysis. Multivariable analysis based on HRAS, VEGFR2, and VEGF identified progression with 81% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Since this is a small retrospective study using medium-throughput profiling, larger confirmatory studies are needed. CONCLUSIONS: Gene expression profiling across relevant cancer pathways appears to be a promising approach for Ta bladder tumor outcome prediction at initial diagnosis. These results could help differentiate between patients who need aggressive versus expectant management.
Authors: Lars Dyrskjøt; Mogens Kruhøffer; Thomas Thykjaer; Niels Marcussen; Jens L Jensen; Klaus Møller; Torben F Ørntoft Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: A Lopez-Beltran; R J Luque; J Alvarez-Kindelan; A Quintero; F Merlo; J C Carrasco; M J Requena; R Montironi Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: I J Schultz; L A Kiemeney; J A Witjes; J A Schalken; J L Willems; D W Swinkels; J B de Kok Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Rafael J Luque; Jose Alvarez-Kindelan; Ana Quintero; Felix Merlo; Maria J Requena; Rodolfo Montironi Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Jo Vandesompele; Katleen De Preter; Filip Pattyn; Bruce Poppe; Nadine Van Roy; Anne De Paepe; Frank Speleman Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2002-06-18 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Lucie C Kompier; Irene Lurkin; Madelon N M van der Aa; Bas W G van Rhijn; Theo H van der Kwast; Ellen C Zwarthoff Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anirban P Mitra; Jose E Castelao; Debra Hawes; Denice D Tsao-Wei; Xuejuan Jiang; Shan-Rong Shi; Ram H Datar; Eila C Skinner; John P Stein; Susan Groshen; Mimi C Yu; Ronald K Ross; Donald G Skinner; Victoria K Cortessis; Richard J Cote Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 6.860