Literature DB >> 19762016

The effect of computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of handwashing theory and skills in pre-qualification nursing students: a randomised controlled trial.

Jacqueline Bloomfield1, Julia Roberts, Alison While.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High quality health care demands a nursing workforce with sound clinical skills. However, the clinical competency of newly qualified nurses continues to stimulate debate about the adequacy of current methods of clinical skills education and emphasises the need for innovative teaching strategies. Despite the increasing use of e-learning within nurse education, evidence to support its use for clinical skills teaching is limited and inconclusive.
OBJECTIVES: This study tested whether nursing students could learn and retain the theory and skill of handwashing more effectively when taught using computer-assisted learning compared with conventional face-to-face methods.
DESIGN: The study employed a two group randomised controlled design. The intervention group used an interactive, multimedia, self-directed computer-assisted learning module. The control group was taught by an experienced lecturer in a clinical skills room. Data were collected over a 5-month period between October 2004 and February 2005. Knowledge was tested at four time points and handwashing skills were assessed twice. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Two-hundred and forty-two first year nursing students of mixed gender; age; educational background and first language studying at one British university were recruited to the study. Participant attrition increased during the study.
RESULTS: Knowledge scores increased significantly from baseline in both groups and no significant differences were detected between the scores of the two groups. Skill performance scores were similar in both groups at the 2-week follow-up with significant differences emerging at the 8-week follow-up in favour of the intervention group, however, this finding must be interpreted with caution in light of sample size and attrition rates.
CONCLUSION: The computer-assisted learning module was an effective strategy for teaching both the theory and practice of handwashing to nursing students and in this study was found to be at least as effective as conventional face-to-face teaching methods. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19762016     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  17 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial comparing computer-aided learning with versus without tuition/lecture in promoting English proficiency.

Authors:  Kritsana Pitak-Arnnop; Pimpa Moungsirithum; Sonti Pitak-Arnnop; Kittipong Dhanuthai; Niels Christian Pausch; Poramate Pitak-Arnnop
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-03-13

2.  Oncology E-Learning for Undergraduate. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  René Aloisio da Costa Vieira; Ana Helena Lopes; Almir José Sarri; Zuleica Caulada Benedetti; Cleyton Zanardo de Oliveira
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Online Versus Face-To-Face Training of Critical Time Intervention: A Matching Cluster Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey Olivet; Suzanne Zerger; R Neil Greene; Rachael R Kenney; Daniel B Herman
Journal:  Am J Distance Educ       Date:  2016-12-16

Review 4.  Assessment of Fidelity in Interventions to Improve Hand Hygiene of Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jackson S Musuuza; Anna Barker; Caitlyn Ngam; Lia Vellardita; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Effect of video-based versus personalized instruction on errors during elastic tubing exercises for musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kenneth Jay; M C Schraefel; Mikkel Brandt; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  The effect of learning via module versus lecture teaching methods on the knowledge and practice of oncology nurses about safety standards with cytotoxic drugs in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.

Authors:  Khadijeh Abbasi; Maryam Hazrati; Nasrin Pourali Mohamadi; Abdolreza Rajaeefard
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2013-11

7.  Offline eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction.

Authors:  Kristine Rasmussen; José Marcano Belisario; Petra A Wark; Joseph Antonio Molina; Stewart Lee Loong; Ziva Cotic; Nikos Papachristou; Eva Riboli-Sasco; Lorainne Tudor Car; Eve Marie Musulanov; Holger Kunz; Yanfeng Zhang; Pradeep Paul George; Bee Hoon Heng; Erica Lynette Wheeler; Najeeb Al Shorbaji; Igor Svab; Rifat Atun; Azeem Majeed; Josip Car
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.413

8.  Factors affecting acquisition of psychomotor clinical skills by student nurses and midwives in CHAM Nursing Colleges in Malawi: A qualitative exploratory study.

Authors:  Omero Gonekani Mwale; Roselyn Kalawa
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2016-05-04

9.  Comparing nurses' knowledge retention following electronic continuous education and educational booklet: a controlled trial study.

Authors:  Mahmud Badiei; Mitra Gharib; Mitra Zolfaghari; Rita Mojtahedzadeh
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-05-07

10.  Improving Nursing Students' Learning Outcomes in Fundamentals of Nursing Course through Combination of Traditional and e-Learning Methods.

Authors:  Rouhollah Sheikhaboumasoudi; Maryam Bagheri; Sayed Abbas Hosseini; Elaheh Ashouri; Nasrin Elahi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2018 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.