Literature DB >> 19760301

Predicting organ space surgical site infection with a nomogram.

Luiz F de Campos-Lobato1, Luiz F Campos-Lobato, Brian Wells, Elizabeth Wick, Kevin Pronty, Ravi Kiran, Feza Remzi, Jon D Vogel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that organ space surgical site infections (organ space SSI) are a unique type of surgical site infection and therefore are associated with a unique set of risk factors. The aim of this study was to create a predictive model for organ space SSI after small bowel, colon, or rectal operations.
METHODS: The 2006 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) sample (N = 12,373) was used to identify current procedural terminology codes for small bowel, colon, and rectal laparoscopic or open surgical procedures. The following variables were used to build a predictive model of organ space SSI within 30 days post-op: age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, smoking, diabetes, steroid use, 30 days previous radiotherapy or surgery, preoperative serum creatinine and albumin, laparoscopic surgery, wound class, perioperative transfusion, operative time, and surgical site. Patients on chronic mechanical ventilation, dialysis, wound infection, or sepsis preoperatively were excluded.
RESULTS: Our organ space SSI model achieved a concordance index of 0.65 when validated in 2007 ACS-NSQIP patients (N = 9,521). A risk calculator designed based upon our model is available at www.clinicriskcalculators.com .
CONCLUSION: This novel and validated nomogram is useful to predict organ space SSI associated with small bowel, colon, and rectal surgical procedures. It may also be useful for risk stratification and risk modification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19760301     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-0968-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  22 in total

1.  Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk.

Authors:  Magdalena A Lipska; Ian P Bissett; Bryan R Parry; Arend E H Merrie
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 2.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Factors associated with failure in managing pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)--a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Ismail Sagap; Feza H Remzi; Jeffrey P Hammel; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Postoperative infections in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Matija Horzic; Mario Kopljar
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

6.  Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients.

Authors:  A Vignali; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J W Milsom; J M Church; T L Hull; S A Strong; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Six years of surgical wound infection surveillance at a tertiary care center: review of the microbiologic and epidemiological aspects of 20,007 wounds.

Authors:  C A Weiss; C L Statz; R A Dahms; M J Remucal; D L Dunn; G J Beilman
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-10

8.  Surgical site infections: reanalysis of risk factors.

Authors:  Debra L Malone; Thomas Genuit; J Kathleen Tracy; Christopher Gannon; Lena M Napolitano
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Predictors of wound infection in ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Kelly R Finan; Catherine C Vick; Catarina I Kiefe; Leigh Neumayer; Mary T Hawn
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis.

Authors:  Jyrki T Mäkelä; Heikki Kiviniemi; Seppo Laitinen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  7 in total

1.  The need for unique risk adjustment for surgical site infections at a high-volume, tertiary care center with inherent high-risk colorectal procedures.

Authors:  E Gorgun; C Benlice; J Hammel; T Hull; L Stocchi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Surgical Management of Complex Enteric Fistulas in Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Luiz Felipe de Campos-Lobato; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-07-02

3.  Predictors and costs of surgical site infections in patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Sean C Dowdy; Bijan J Borah; Lindsey R Haas; Andrea Mariani; Janice R Martin; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; William A Cliby; Karl C Podratz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Nomograms for colorectal cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kazushige Kawai; Eiji Sunami; Hironori Yamaguchi; Soichiro Ishihara; Shinsuke Kazama; Hiroaki Nozawa; Keisuke Hata; Tomomichi Kiyomatsu; Junichiro Tanaka; Toshiaki Tanaka; Takeshi Nishikawa; Joji Kitayama; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Risk Stratification for Organ/Space Surgical Site Infection in Advanced Digestive System Cancer.

Authors:  Chen Sun; Hui Gao; Yuelun Zhang; Lijian Pei; Yuguang Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Better characterization of operation for ulcerative colitis through the National surgical quality improvement program: A 2-year audit of NSQIP-IBD.

Authors:  William Y Luo; Stefan D Holubar; Liliana Bordeianou; Bard C Cosman; Roxanne Hyke; Edward C Lee; Evangelos Messaris; Julia Saraidaridis; Jeffrey S Scow; Virginia O Shaffer; Radhika Smith; Randolph M Steinhagen; Florin Vaida; Samuel Eisenstein
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Adding propensity scores to pure prediction models fails to improve predictive performance.

Authors:  Amy S Nowacki; Brian J Wells; Changhong Yu; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.