Literature DB >> 19759361

High test-retest reliability of the extended version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" test.

Antje Haehner1, Anna-Maria Mayer, Basile N Landis, Irene Pournaras, Katja Lill, Volker Gudziol, Thomas Hummel.   

Abstract

The "Sniffin' Sticks" test kit is a validated and commonly used tool for assessment of olfactory function in subjects with normal sense of smell and in individuals with smell loss. That test incorporates subtests for odor threshold, discrimination, and identification. To gain higher subtest reproducibility, tests on odor discrimination and odor identification were extended using 32 instead of the usually applied 16 single trials each. In developing the extended Sniffin' Sticks test, a number of preliminary experiments were performed in 46 healthy, normosmic individuals 1) to evaluate intensity and familiarity of the additionally selected odors, 2) to select distractors for the discrimination and identification test, and 3) to evaluate the test-retest reliability of each subtest. Furthermore, the extended test was applied to 126 patients with olfactory loss and 71 normosmic individuals. Follow-up investigation could be performed in 69 controls within an average interval of 4 days. Results revealed significant differences between patients and healthy subjects. Estimated intensity and familiarity of the newly selected 16 items of the discrimination test did not differ significantly from the 16 standard items. Test-retest reliability was found to be r = 0.80 (odor discrimination), r = 0.88 (odor identification), and r = 0.92 (odor threshold). In conclusion, the extended test kit allows a precise evaluation of olfactory function, especially when different olfactory tasks are assessed using individual subtests. Furthermore, the high test-retest reliability of both the 16 and the 32-item tests allows the evaluation of even relatively small changes of olfactory function over time by means of either test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19759361     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjp057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  43 in total

Review 1.  OLAF: standardization of international olfactory tests.

Authors:  C Hummel; G M Zucco; E Iannilli; W Maboshe; B N Landis; T Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Hunger state affects both olfactory abilities and gustatory sensitivity.

Authors:  Deniz Hanci; Huseyin Altun
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The 40-item Monell Extended Sniffin' Sticks Identification Test (MONEX-40).

Authors:  Jessica Freiherr; Amy R Gordon; Eva C Alden; Andrea L Ponting; Monica F Hernandez; Sanne Boesveldt; Johan N Lundström
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Reduced olfactory bulb volume in depression-A structural moderator analysis.

Authors:  Fabian Rottstädt; Pengfei Han; Kerstin Weidner; Julia Schellong; Sylvia Wolff-Stephan; Timmy Strauß; Hagen Kitzler; Thomas Hummel; Ilona Croy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Olfaction Sensitivity in Morbidly Obese Patients.

Authors:  Deniz Hancı; Huseyin Altun; Hasan Altun; Burcin Batman; Aziz Bora Karip; Kursat Rahmi Serin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  The impact and prospect of traumatic brain injury on olfactory function: a cross-sectional and prospective study.

Authors:  Volker Gudziol; Irene Hoenck; Basile Landis; Dino Podlesek; Maria Bayn; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Olfaction and sinonasal symptoms in patients with CRSwNP and AERD and without AERD: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

Authors:  V Gudziol; M Michel; C Sonnefeld; D Koschel; T Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  A computer-controlled olfactometer for a self-administered odor identification test.

Authors:  Valentin Alexander Schriever; Johannes Körner; Robert Beyer; Samanta Viana; Han-Seok Seo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Smell perception in normal tension glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Maneli Mozaffarieh; Daniela Hauenstein; Andreas Schoetzau; Katarzyna Konieczka; Josef Flammer
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 2.367

10.  Olfactory dysfunction in spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Esin Yalcinkaya; Mustafa Mert Basaran; Hakan Erdem; Murat Kocyigit; Aytug Altundag; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.