Literature DB >> 19757923

Crowding, reading, and developmental dyslexia.

Marialuisa Martelli1, Gloria Di Filippo, Donatella Spinelli, Pierluigi Zoccolotti.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that crowding effects are responsible for the reading slowness characteristic of developmental dyslexia. A total of twenty-nine Italian dyslexics and thirty-three age-matched controls participated in various parts of the study. In Experiment 1, we measured contrast thresholds for identifying letters and words as a function of stimulus duration. Thresholds were higher in dyslexics than controls for words (at a limited time exposure) but not for single letters. Adding noise to the stimuli produced comparable effects in dyslexics and controls. At the long time exposure thresholds were comparable in the two groups. In Experiment 2, we measured the spacing between a target letter and two flankers at a fixed level of performance as a function of eccentricity and size. With eccentricity, the critical spacing (CS) scaled in the control group with 0.62 proportionality (a value of b close to Bouma's law, 0.50) and with a greater proportionality (0.95) in the dyslexic group. CS was independent of size in both groups. In Experiment 3, we examined the critical print size (CPS), that is, the increase in reading rate up to a critical character size (S. T. Chung, J. S. Mansfield, & G. E. Legge, 1998). CPS of dyslexic children was greater than that of controls. Individual maximal reading speed was predicted by individual bs (from Experiment 2). The maximal reading rate achieved by dyslexics at CPS (and also for larger print sizes) was below the values observed in controls. We conclude that word analysis in dyslexics is slowed because of greater crowding effects, which limit letter identification in multi-letter arrays across the visual field. We propose that the peripheral reading of normal readers might constitute a model for dyslexic reading. The periphery model accounts for 60% of dyslexics' slowness. After compensating for crowding, the dyslexics' reading rate remains slower than that of proficient readers. This failure is discussed in terms of a developmental learning effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19757923     DOI: 10.1167/9.4.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  40 in total

1.  Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia.

Authors:  Marco Zorzi; Chiara Barbiero; Andrea Facoetti; Isabella Lonciari; Marco Carrozzi; Marcella Montico; Laura Bravar; Florence George; Catherine Pech-Georgel; Johannes C Ziegler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Helping dyslexic children attend to letters within visual word forms.

Authors:  Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The effect of decreased interletter spacing on orthographic processing.

Authors:  Veronica Montani; Andrea Facoetti; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

Review 4.  Neuroscience and education: prime time to build the bridge.

Authors:  Mariano Sigman; Marcela Peña; Andrea P Goldin; Sidarta Ribeiro
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Linking crowding, visual span, and reading.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition.

Authors:  David Whitney; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Dyslexic Readers Improve without Training When Using a Computer-Guided Reading Strategy.

Authors:  Reinhard Werth
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-04-21

8.  Evaluation of spatial anisotropy by curvature analysis of elliptical targets.

Authors:  Carlo Aleci; Giulio Piana; Franco Anselmino
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2010-05-31

9.  The effect of aging on crowded letter recognition in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  Andrew T Astle; Alan J Blighe; Ben S Webb; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Crowding deficits in the visual periphery of schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Rainer Kraehenmann; Franz X Vollenweider; Erich Seifritz; Michael Kometer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.