Literature DB >> 19757906

Combination of noisy directional visual and proprioceptive information.

Sascha Serwe1, Knut Drewing, Julia Trommershäuser.   

Abstract

We present experimental and computational evidence for the estimation of visual and proprioceptive directional information during forward, visually driven arm movements. We presented noisy directional proprioceptive and visual stimuli simultaneously and in isolation midway during a pointing movement. Directional proprioceptive stimuli were created by brief force pulses, which varied in direction and were applied to the fingertip shortly after movement onset. Subjects indicated the perceived direction of the stimulus after each trial. We measured unimodal performance in trials in which we presented only the visual or only the proprioceptive stimulus. When we presented simultaneous but conflicting bimodal information, subjects' perceived direction fell in between the visual and proprioceptive directions. We find that the judged mean orientation matched the MLE predictions but did not show the expected improvement in reliability as compared to unimodal performance. We present an alternative model (probabilistic cue switching, PCS), which is consistent with our data. According to this model, subjects base their bimodal judgments on only one of two directional cues in a given trial, with relative choice probabilities proportional to the average stimulus reliability. These results suggest that subjects based their decision on a probability mixture of both modalities without integrating information across modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19757906     DOI: 10.1167/9.5.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  9 in total

Review 1.  Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Testing the limits of optimal integration of visual and proprioceptive information of path trajectory.

Authors:  Johanna Reuschel; Frank Rösler; Denise Y P Henriques; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual-haptic cue integration with spatial and temporal disparity during pointing movements.

Authors:  Sascha Serwe; Konrad P Körding; Julia Trommershäuser
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Age effects on controlling tools with sensorimotor transformations.

Authors:  Christine Sutter; Stefan Ladwig; Michael Oehl; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-24

5.  Trust in haptic assistance: weighting visual and haptic cues based on error history.

Authors:  Tricia L Gibo; Winfred Mugge; David A Abbink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Experimentally disambiguating models of sensory cue integration.

Authors:  Peter Scarfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The influence of intersensory discrepancy on visuo-haptic integration is similar in 6-year-old children and adults.

Authors:  Bianca Jovanovic; Knut Drewing
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-30

8.  Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal "weights" take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools.

Authors:  Chie Takahashi; Simon J Watt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-14

9.  Visual and haptic integration in the estimation of softness of deformable objects.

Authors:  Cristiano Cellini; Lukas Kaim; Knut Drewing
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-11-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.