Literature DB >> 19755635

Invited Commentary: Causal diagrams and measurement bias.

Miguel A Hernán1, Stephen R Cole.   

Abstract

Causal inferences about the effect of an exposure on an outcome may be biased by errors in the measurement of either the exposure or the outcome. Measurement errors of exposure and outcome can be classified into 4 types: independent nondifferential, dependent nondifferential, independent differential, and dependent differential. Here the authors describe how causal diagrams can be used to represent these 4 types of measurement bias and discuss some problems that arise when using measured exposure variables (e.g., body mass index) to make inferences about the causal effects of unmeasured constructs (e.g., "adiposity"). The authors conclude that causal diagrams need to be used to represent biases arising not only from confounding and selection but also from measurement.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19755635      PMCID: PMC2765368          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  11 in total

1.  Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation: an application to birth defects epidemiology.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Martha M Werler; Allen A Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Data, design, and background knowledge in etiologic inference.

Authors:  J M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  A structural approach to selection bias.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  The consistency statement in causal inference: a definition or an assumption?

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Constantine E Frangakis
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value?

Authors:  M Dosemeci; S Wacholder; J H Lubin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  The association of body mass index with health outcomes: causal, inconsistent, or confounded?

Authors:  Eyal Shahar
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Does body mass index adequately capture the relation of body composition and body size to health outcomes?

Authors:  K B Michels; S Greenland; B A Rosner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  When will nondifferential misclassification of an exposure preserve the direction of a trend?

Authors:  C R Weinberg; D M Umbach; S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Signed directed acyclic graphs for causal inference.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; James M Robins
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.488

10.  Causal models for estimating the effects of weight gain on mortality.

Authors:  J M Robins
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.095

View more
  67 in total

Review 1.  An introduction to causal inference.

Authors:  Judea Pearl
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Causal inference methods to study nonrandomized, preexisting development interventions.

Authors:  Benjamin F Arnold; Ranjiv S Khush; Padmavathi Ramaswamy; Alicia G London; Paramasivan Rajkumar; Prabhakar Ramaprabha; Natesan Durairaj; Alan E Hubbard; Kalpana Balakrishnan; John M Colford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Results on differential and dependent measurement error of the exposure and the outcome using signed directed acyclic graphs.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  The role of at-risk alcohol/drug use and treatment in appointment attendance and virologic suppression among HIV(+) African Americans.

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Stephen R Cole; Sonia Napravnik; Jay S Kaufman; Adaora A Adimora; Beth Elston; Joseph J Eron; Michael J Mugavero
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.205

5.  All your data are always missing: incorporating bias due to measurement error into the potential outcomes framework.

Authors:  Jessie K Edwards; Stephen R Cole; Daniel Westreich
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Risk.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Michael G Hudgens; M Alan Brookhart; Daniel Westreich
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Simple Sensitivity Analysis for Differential Measurement Error.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Yige Li
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Nonparametric Bounds for the Risk Function.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Michael G Hudgens; Jessie K Edwards; M Alan Brookhart; David B Richardson; Daniel Westreich; Adaora A Adimora
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Are all biases missing data problems?

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Lauren E Cain; Joseph W Hogan
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2015-07-12

10.  Using marginal structural measurement-error models to estimate the long-term effect of antiretroviral therapy on incident AIDS or death.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Lisa P Jacobson; Phyllis C Tien; Lawrence Kingsley; Joan S Chmiel; Kathryn Anastos
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.