Literature DB >> 19755604

Principles, techniques, and applications of T2*-based MR imaging and its special applications.

Govind B Chavhan1, Paul S Babyn, Bejoy Thomas, Manohar M Shroff, E Mark Haacke.   

Abstract

T2* relaxation refers to decay of transverse magnetization caused by a combination of spin-spin relaxation and magnetic field inhomogeneity. T2* relaxation is seen only with gradient-echo (GRE) imaging because transverse relaxation caused by magnetic field inhomogeneities is eliminated by the 180 degrees pulse at spin-echo imaging. T2* relaxation is one of the main determinants of image contrast with GRE sequences and forms the basis for many magnetic resonance (MR) applications, such as susceptibility-weighted (SW) imaging, perfusion MR imaging, and functional MR imaging. GRE sequences can be made predominantly T2* weighted by using a low flip angle, long echo time, and long repetition time. GRE sequences with T2*-based contrast are used to depict hemorrhage, calcification, and iron deposition in various tissues and lesions. SW imaging uses phase information in addition to T2*-based contrast to exploit the magnetic susceptibility differences of the blood and of iron and calcification in various tissues. Perfusion MR imaging exploits the signal intensity decrease that occurs with the passage of a high concentration of gadopentetate dimeglumine through the microvasculature. Change in oxygen saturation during specific tasks changes the local T2*, which leads to the blood oxygen level-dependent effect seen at functional MR imaging. The basics of T2* relaxation, T2*-weighted sequences, and their clinical applications are presented, followed by the principles, techniques, and clinical uses of four T2*-based applications, including SW imaging, perfusion MR imaging, functional MR imaging, and iron overload imaging. (c) RSNA, 2009.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19755604      PMCID: PMC2799958          DOI: 10.1148/rg.295095034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  40 in total

Review 1.  Hypointensities in the brain on T2*-weighted gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yoshito Tsushima; Keigo Endo
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

2.  Evaluation of small (<or=2 cm) dysplastic nodules and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas with ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI in a 1.0-T MRI unit: utility of T2*-weighted gradient echo sequences with an intermediate-echo time.

Authors:  Tatsuyuki Tonan; Kiminori Fujimoto; Sanae Azuma; Noriyuki Ono; Sunao Matsushita; Masamichi Kojiro; Naofumi Hayabuchi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  Clinical applications of susceptibility weighted MR imaging of the brain - a pictorial review.

Authors:  Bejoy Thomas; Sivaraman Somasundaram; Krishnamoorthy Thamburaj; Chandrasekharan Kesavadas; Arun Kumar Gupta; Narendra K Bodhey; Tirur Raman Kapilamoorthy
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Diffusion-weighted and perfusion MR imaging for brain tumor characterization and assessment of treatment response.

Authors:  James M Provenzale; Srinivasan Mukundan; Daniel P Barboriak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of excess iron in thalassemia, sickle cell disease and other iron overload diseases.

Authors:  John C Wood; Nilesh Ghugre
Journal:  Hemoglobin       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.849

6.  Assessment of hemorrhage in pituitary macroadenoma by T2*-weighted gradient-echo MR imaging.

Authors:  M Tosaka; N Sato; J Hirato; H Fujimaki; R Yamaguchi; H Kohga; K Hashimoto; M Yamada; M Mori; N Saito; Y Yoshimoto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Susceptibility-weighted MR imaging: a review of clinical applications in children.

Authors:  K A Tong; S Ashwal; A Obenaus; J P Nickerson; D Kido; E M Haacke
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Establishing a baseline phase behavior in magnetic resonance imaging to determine normal vs. abnormal iron content in the brain.

Authors:  E Mark Haacke; Muhammad Ayaz; Asadullah Khan; Elena S Manova; Bharani Krishnamurthy; Lakshman Gollapalli; Carlo Ciulla; I Kim; Floyd Petersen; Wolff Kirsch
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Progress in magnetic resonance imaging of brain tumours.

Authors:  Marc Lemort; Ana Cristina Canizares-Perez; Anja Van der Stappen; Stelianos Kampouridis
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 10.  MRI evaluation of tissue iron burden in patients with beta-thalassaemia major.

Authors:  Maria I Argyropoulou; Loukas Astrakas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-08-21
View more
  172 in total

1.  Noninvasive Assessment of Biochemical and Mechanical Properties of Lumbar Discs Through Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Asymptomatic Volunteers.

Authors:  Mary H Foltz; Craig C Kage; Casey P Johnson; Arin M Ellingson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Differential effects of age and history of hypertension on regional brain volumes and iron.

Authors:  Karen M Rodrigue; E Mark Haacke; Naftali Raz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Liver iron concentration quantification by MRI: are recommended protocols accurate enough for clinical practice?

Authors:  Agustin Castiella; Jose M Alústiza; Jose I Emparanza; Eva Ma Zapata; Belen Costero; Maria I Díez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  [Principles and applications of susceptibility weighted imaging].

Authors:  F T Kurz; M Freitag; H-P Schlemmer; M Bendszus; C H Ziener
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  T2* Mapping Provides Information That Is Statistically Comparable to an Arthroscopic Evaluation of Acetabular Cartilage.

Authors:  Patrick Morgan; Mikko J Nissi; John Hughes; Shabnam Mortazavi; Jutta Ellermann
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  A Fluorinated Ionic Liquid-Based Activatable 19F MRI Platform Detects Biological Targets.

Authors:  Xianglong Zhu; Xiaoxue Tang; Hongyu Lin; Saige Shi; Hehe Xiong; Qiuju Zhou; Ao Li; Qiaoyang Wang; Xiaoyuan Chen; Jinhao Gao
Journal:  Chem       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 22.804

7.  In vivo normative atlas of the hippocampal subfields using multi-echo susceptibility imaging at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Maged Goubran; David A Rudko; Brendan Santyr; Joe Gati; Trevor Szekeres; Terry M Peters; Ali R Khan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Survival analysis in patients with newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma multiforme using pre- and post-treatment peritumoral perfusion imaging parameters.

Authors:  Asim K Bag; Phillip C Cezayirli; Jake J Davenport; Santhosh Gaddikeri; Hassan M Fathallah-Shaykh; Alan Cantor; Xiaosi S Han; Louis B Nabors
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Monitoring the effects of bevacizumab beyond progression in a murine colorectal cancer model: a functional imaging approach.

Authors:  L Heijmen; C J A Punt; E G W Ter Voert; L F de Geus-Oei; A Heerschap; J Bussink; C G J Sweep; V Zerbi; W J G Oyen; P N Span; O Boerman; H W M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  T2* relaxometry and volume predict semi-quantitative histological scoring of an ACL bridge-enhanced primary repair in a porcine model.

Authors:  Alison M Biercevicz; Benedikt L Proffen; Martha M Murray; Edward G Walsh; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.