| Literature DB >> 19755520 |
Raffaele Lodi1, Piero Parchi, Caterina Tonon, David Manners, Sabina Capellari, Rosaria Strammiello, Rita Rinaldi, Claudia Testa, Emil Malucelli, Barbara Mostacci, Giovanni Rizzo, Giulia Pierangeli, Pietro Cortelli, Pasquale Montagna, Bruno Barbiroli.
Abstract
The intra vitam diagnosis of prion disease is challenging and a definite diagnosis still requires neuropathological examination in non-familial cases. Magnetic resonance imaging has gained increasing importance in the diagnosis of prion disease. The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of different magnetic resonance imaging sequences and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the differential diagnosis of patients with rapidly progressive neurological signs compatible with the clinical diagnosis of sporadic prion disease. Twenty-nine consecutive patients with an initial diagnosis of possible or probable sporadic prion disease, on the basis of clinical and electroencephalography features, were recruited. The magnetic resonance protocol included axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-T2- and diffusion-weighted images, and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the thalamus, striatum, cerebellum and occipital cortex. Based on the clinical follow-up, genetic studies and neuropathology, the final diagnosis was of prion disease in 14 patients out of 29. The percentage of correctly diagnosed cases was 86% for diffusion-weighted imaging (hyperintensity in the striatum/cerebral cortex), 86% for thalamic N-acetyl-aspartate to creatine ratio (cutoff </=1.21), 90% for thalamic N-acetyl-aspartate to myo-inositol (mI) ratio (cutoff </=1.05) and 86% for cerebral spinal fluid 14-3-3 protein. All the prion disease patients had N-acetyl-aspartate to creatine ratios </=1.21 (100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value) and all the non-prion patients had N-acetyl-aspartate to myo-inositol ratios >1.05 (100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the combination of thalamic N-acetyl-aspartate to creatine ratio and diffusion-weighted imaging correctly classified 93% of the patients. The combination of thalamic proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (10 min acquisition duration) and brain diffusion-weighted imaging (2 min acquisition duration) may increase the diagnostic accuracy of the magnetic resonance scan. Both sequences should be routinely included in the clinical work-up of patients with suspected prion disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19755520 PMCID: PMC2759338 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awp210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain ISSN: 0006-8950 Impact factor: 13.501
Figure 1Summary of subject enrolment and study design. sFI = sporadic fatal insomnia; FFI = familial fatal insomnia.
Clinical EEG, CSF and neuroradiological data of patients with definite/probable prion disease or without prion disease
| Case ( | Age at onset/ sex | Duration of disease at MRI (months) | Dementia | C/V | P/EP | M | AM | Initial clinical and EEG diagnosis | CSF 14-3-3 | MRI | Final diagnosis | Follow-up | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72/M | 7 | Memory deficit | C | EP | + | + | − | Possible prion disease | + | + | Definite sCJD VV2 | Dead 6 m after onset/2 m after scan |
| 2 | 43/F | 11 | + | C | − | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | − | − | Definite sFI MM2 | Dead 23 m after onset/12 m after scan |
| 3 | 61/F | 3 | + | V | − | + | − | + | Probable prion disease | + | + | Definite fCJD V210I-129MM MM1 | Dead 4 m after onset/1 m after scan |
| 4 | 65/F | 3.5 | + | C | P | − | − | − | Possible prion disease | + | + | Definite sCJD VV2 | Dead 8 m after onset/4.5 m after scan |
| 5 | 40/M | 5 | Memory deficit | C/V | EP | + | + | − | Possible prion disease | + | + | Probable sCJD VV | Dead 7 m after onset/2 m after scan; autopsy not done |
| 6 | 61/F | 2 | + | C/V | EP | + | − | + | Probable prion disease | + | + | Definite sCJD MM1 | Dead 4 m after onset/2 m after scan |
| 7 | 49/F | 4.5 | − | C | − | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | + | + | Definite fCJD E200K-129MV MV2 | Dead 10 m after onset/5.5 m after scan |
| 8 | 74/F | 11 | + | V | P/EP | + | + | − | Possible prion disease | + | + | Definite sCJD MV2 | Dead 15 m after onset/4 m after scan |
| 9 | 65/F | 26 | + | − | P/EP | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | + | + | Definite sCJD MV2 | Dead 36 m after onset/10 m after scan |
| 10 | 78/M | 3 | Memory deficit | C | EP | + | + | − | Possible prion disease | + | + | Definite sCJD VV2 | Dead 7 m after onset/4 m after scan |
| 11 | 67/F | 5 | + | C/V | P | + | + | + | Probable prion disease | + | + | Probable sCJD MM | Alive; progressive worsening follow-up >1 years |
| 12 | 34/M | 16 | + | − | EP | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | + | + | Probable sCJD MV | Alive; progressive worsening follow-up >1 years |
| 13 | 69/M | 3 | + | V | − | + | − | + | Probable prion disease | + | + | Definite sCJD MM1 | Dead 4 m after onset/1 m after scan |
| 14 | 45/M | 11 | − | V/C | P | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | − | − | Definite FFI D178N-129MV | Alive; progressive worsening follow-up >1 years |
| 15 | 54/F | 9 | + | − | P | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | − | − | Possible Alzheimer disease | Alive; follow-up >2 years |
| 16 | 68/F | 3 | + | − | EP | + | − | + | Probable prion disease | − | − | Probable dementia with Lewy bodies | Alive; follow-up >2 years |
| 17 | 62/F | 24 | + | − | EP | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | − | − | Probable cortico-basal degeneration | Alive; follow-up >3 years |
| 18 | 56/M | 1 | + | − | EP | − | + | − | Possible prion disease | − | + | Possible autoimmune encephalitis | Asymptomatic after corticosteroid therapy; follow-up >2 years |
| 19 | 74/M | 4 | + | C | − | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | − | − | Possible autoimmune encephalitis | Dead 6 m from onset; autopsy not done |
| 20 | 63/M | 10 | + | − | P/EP | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | − | − | Paraneoplastic encephalitis | Dead 16 m from onset; autopsy not done |
| 21 | 64/M | 3 | + | C | − | + | − | Possible prion disease | − | − | Probable autoimmune encephalitis | Improvement after corticosteroid therapy; follow-up >2 years | |
| 22 | 66/M | 3 | + | − | P/EP | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | − | − | Probable autoimmune encephalitis | Improvement after corticosteroid therapy; follow-up >2 years |
| 23 | 81/F | 36 | Memory deficit | − | EP | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | − | − | Probable cortico-basal degeneration | Alive; follow-up > 2 years |
| 24 | 69/F | 12 | + | − | EP | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | − | − | Probable cortico-basal degeneration | Alive; follow-up > 2 years |
| 25 | 77/M | 6 | Progressive aphasia | − | P | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | − | − | Probable fronto-temporal dementia/ALS | Dead 7 m from onset; autopsy not done |
| 26 | 55/M | 24 | Memory deficit | + | P/EP | − | − | − | Possible prion disease | − | Atypic parkinsonism | Alive; follow-up > 2 years | |
| 27 | 64/M | 24 | + | − | P | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | − | − | f-Cerebral amyloidosis | Alive; follow-up > 2 years |
| 28 | 34/F | 5 | + | − | P | + | − | + | Probable prion disease | + | + | Unknown; clinical improvement | Alive; follow-up > 1 years |
| 29 | 63/M | 2 | + | C | − | + | − | − | Possible prion disease | + | − | Unknown; clinical improvement | Alive; follow-up > 0.5 years |
D = dementia; C/V = cerebellar/visual signs; P/EP = pyramidal/extrapyramidal signs; M = myoclonus; AM = akinetic mutism; EEG = the presence of periodic sharp and slow wave complexes is indicated with plus symbol; CSF = the increase in the content of 14-3-3 protein is indicated with plus symbol; MRI = basal ganglia and/or cortical hyperintensity on FLAIR and/or DWI is indicated with plus symbol; ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; sCJD = sporadic CJD; fCJD = familial CJD linked to PRNP mutation; PSWC = periodic sharp and slow wave complexes; sFI = sporadic fatal insomnia; FFI = familial fatal insomnia; m = month.
Figure 2Proton magnetic resonance spectra localization: (A) bilateral dorso-medial thalamus, (B) left striatum (caudate head and anterior putamen), (C) left cerebellum and (D) mid brain occipital cortex.
Evaluation of SI in FLAIR-T2 and DWI images of patients with or without prion disease
| Case | FLAIR-T2 | DWI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Striatum | Thalamus | Cerebral cortex | Striatum | Thalamus | Cerebral cortex |
| 1 | + | − | − | + | + | − |
| 2 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 3 | + | − | − | + | − | + |
| 4 | + | + | − | + | + | − |
| 5 | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 6 | + | − | + | + | − | + |
| 7 | + | − | − | + | + | − |
| 8 | + | − | + | + | + | + |
| 9 | − | − | − | + | − | + |
| 10 | + | − | − | + | + | − |
| 11 | + | − | + | + | − | + |
| 12 | + | − | + | + | − | + |
| 13 | + | − | − | + | − | + |
| 14 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 15 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 16 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 17 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 18 | + | + | − | + | + | − |
| 19 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 20 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 21 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 22 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 23 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 24 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 25 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 26 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 27 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 28 | − | − | + | − | − | + |
| 29 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
SI was evaluated in the striatum, thalamus and cerebral cortex.
+ = hyperintensity; − = normal SI.
Figure 3FLAIR-T2 (top) and DWI (middle), and thalamic 1H-MRS (bottom) from Case #4 with definite sporadic CJD, VV2 (A), Case #2 with definite sporadic fatal insomnia, MM2 (B), Case #18 with possible autoimmune encephalitis (C) and Case #6 with definite sporadic CJD, MM1 (D). On MRI, Case #4 shows increased SI in the striatum and thalamus, Case #2 no SI changes, Case #18 increased SI in the striatum and thalamus and Case #6 increased SI in the striatum and cerebral cortex. On 1H-MRS of the thalamus, all the three prion patients (A, B and D) showed, relative to creatine-phosphocreatine (Cr) a severe reduction of the neuronal marker NAA. The patient without prion disease (C) showed normal thalamic spectrum. ppm = parts per million.
1H-MRS data obtained in four different regions of interest from patients with prion disease, patients without prion disease and healthy controls
| Regions of interest | NAA/Cr | Cho/Cr | mi/Cr | NAA/mi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with prion disease (14) | 0.98 ± 0.13 | 0.30 ± 0.07 | 1.05 ± 0.19 | 0.96 ± 0.21 |
| Patients without prion disease (15) | 1.24 ± 0.11 | 0.31 ± 0.05 | 0.86 ± 0.23 | 1.64 ± 0.84 |
| Healthy subjects (10) | 1.37 ± 0.12 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | 0.82 ± 0.15 | 1.71 ± 0.25 |
| | ||||
| Patients with prion disease (10) | 0.85 ± 0.16 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | 0.86 ± 0.29 | 0.97 ± 0.33 |
| Patients without prion disease (12) | 0.87 ± 0.17 | 0.27 ± 0.05 | 0.89 ± 0.391 | 1.27 ± 0.801 |
| Healthy subjects (8) | 1.09 ± 0.24 | 0.24 ± 0.07 | 0.73 ± 0.082 | 1.55 ± 0.322 |
| | ||||
| Patients with prion disease (14) | 0.85 ± 0.22 | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.14 | 1.23 ± 0.38 |
| Patients without prion disease (15) | 0.99 ± 0.10 | 0.27 ± 0.06 | 0.65 ± 0.133 | 1.58 ± 0.363 |
| Healthy subjects (10) | 1.15 ± 0.16 | 0.27 ± 0.04 | 0.65 ± 0.12 | 1.71 ± 0.31 |
| | ||||
| Patients with prion disease (14) | 1.19 ± 0.16 | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 0.82 ± 0.16 | 1.51 ± 0.42 |
| Patients without prion disease (15) | 1.26 ± 0.14 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.72 ± 0.143 | 1.89 ± 0.923 |
| Healthy subjects (10) | 1.32 ± 0.07 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.78 ± 0.11 | 1.71 ± 0.21 |
| |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ANOVA test: P < 0.05 were considered significant. The number of spectra included in the analysis is indicated in parenthesis. When individual metabolites were not included in the analysis (SD > 20%) superscript numbers are used: ; mi = myo-inositol.
Significant P values are indicated in bold.
Post hoc analysis of 1H-MRS variables that were significant on the ANOVA test (Table 3)
| Prion patients versus non-prion patients | Prion patients versus healthy subjects | Non-prion patients versus healthy subjects | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NAA/Cr | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.038 |
| mi/Cr | 0.045 | 0.028 | NS |
| NAA/mi | 0.006 | 0.007 | NS |
| NAA/Cr | NS | 0.034 | 0.048 |
| NAA/Cr | NS | <0.001 | NS |
| NAA/mi | NS | 0.035 | NS |
The Student's t-test after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was used, applying a significance threshold of P < 0.05; mi = myo-inositol; NS = not significant.
Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and percentage of cases correctly diagnosed of 1H-MRS variables from the thalamus and cerebellum, DWI and CSF 14-3-3 protein for the discrimination between patients with and without prion disease
| Sensitivity (%) | 100 | 79 |
| Specificity (%) | 73 | 100 |
| PPV (%) | 78 | 100 |
| NPV (%) | 100 | 83 |
| Cases correctly identified (%) | 86 | 90 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 64 | 86 |
| Specificity (%) | 87 | 57 |
| PPV (%) | 82 | 67 |
| NPV (%) | 72 | 80 |
| Cases correctly identified (%) | 76 | 62 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 86 | 86 |
| Specificity (%) | 87 | 87 |
| PPV (%) | 86 | 86 |
| NPV (%) | 87 | 87 |
| Cases correctly identified (%) | 86 | 86 |
For 1H-MRS variables cutoff values were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis; mi = myo-inositol.