Literature DB >> 19754247

Characteristics associated with mammography screening among both Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women.

Evelinn A Borrayo1, Lisa Hines, Tim Byers, Betsy Risendal, Martha L Slattery, Carol Sweeney, Kathy B Baumgartner, Anna Giuliano.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study explores whether certain population characteristics are associated with adherence to mammography screening guidelines among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white (NHW) women living in the southwestern United States.
METHODS: Participants in a population-based study (4-Corners' Breast Cancer Study) included in this analysis were 790 Hispanic women and 1,441 NHW women. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compute the ethnic-specific adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of the outcome variable (adherent vs. nonadherent) and its correlates. Women were adherent if they had obtained their first mammogram between 41 and 50 years of age and had received at least one mammogram per 2 years or less.
RESULTS: Ethnic-specific associations were observed with certain population characteristics and mammography adherence. Specifically, characteristics that were significantly associated with adherence among Hispanic women were younger age (50-59 years), having a family history of breast cancer, nulliparity, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, and performing regular breast self-examinations (BSE). Among NHW women, younger age (50-59 years), family history of breast cancer, obesity, consuming moderate amounts of alcohol, and taking HRT were associated with mammography adherence. When adjusting for the evaluated population characteristics, the relationship between ethnicity and mammography adherence was no longer apparent.
CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic-specific characteristics appear to explain differences in mammography adherence among Hispanic and NHW women. Disparities in screening rates, late-stage disease and breast cancer mortality that impact Hispanic women could potentially be addressed more effectively by interventions that specifically target the unique characteristics of the Hispanic population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19754247      PMCID: PMC2825680          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  44 in total

1.  The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening?

Authors:  M S O'Malley; J A Earp; S T Hawley; M J Schell; H F Mathews; J Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  N Breen; D K Wagener; M L Brown; W W Davis; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-11-21       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  P A van den Brandt; D Spiegelman; S S Yaun; H O Adami; L Beeson; A R Folsom; G Fraser; R A Goldbohm; S Graham; L Kushi; J R Marshall; A B Miller; T Rohan; S A Smith-Warner; F E Speizer; W C Willett; A Wolk; D J Hunter
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Differences in breast cancer screening rates: an issue of ethnicity or socioeconomics?

Authors:  M Qureshi; H L Thacker; D G Litaker; C Kippes
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2000-11

5.  Prevalence and associated factors of cancer screening: why are so many older Mexican American women never screened?

Authors:  Z H Wu; S A Black; K S Markides
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Breast cancer size and stage in Hispanic American women, by birthplace: 1992-1995.

Authors:  A N Hedeen; E White
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Impact of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on mammography and Pap test utilization among white, Hispanic, and African American women: 1996-2000.

Authors:  E Kathleen Adams; Nancy Breen; Peter J Joski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Body size, weight change, fat distribution and breast cancer risk in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women.

Authors:  Martha L Slattery; Carol Sweeney; Sandra Edwards; Jennifer Herrick; Kathy Baumgartner; Roger Wolff; Maureen Murtaugh; Richard Baumgartner; Anna Giuliano; Tim Byers
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Physical activity and breast cancer risk among women in the southwestern United States.

Authors:  Martha L Slattery; Sandra Edwards; Maureen A Murtaugh; Carol Sweeney; Jennifer Herrick; Tim Byers; Anna R Giuliano; Kathy B Baumgartner
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Determinants of a healthy lifestyle and use of preventive screening in Canada.

Authors:  Vikky Qi; Susan P Phillips; Wilma M Hopman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  13 in total

1.  Mammography screening among Mexican, Central-American, and South-American women.

Authors:  Monica Rosales; Patricia Gonzalez
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2013-04

2.  Factors influencing adherence to mammography screening guidelines in Appalachian women participating in a mobile mammography program.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Traci LeMasters; Elvonna Atkins; Sara Gainor; Stephenie Kennedy; Kimberly Kelly; Linda Vona-Davis; Scot Remick
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-06

3.  The role of physician involvement in Latinas' mammography screening adherence.

Authors:  Patricia González; Evelinn A Borrayo
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011-01-13

4.  Was the drop in mammography rates in 2005 associated with the drop in hormone therapy use?

Authors:  Nancy Breen; Kathleen A Cronin; Jasmin A Tiro; Helen I Meissner; Timothy S McNeel; Susan A Sabatino; Florence K Tangka; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Predictors of self-reported adherence to mammography screening guidelines in West Virginia women visiting a stationary facility.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Kimberly Kelly; Aaron Metzger; Judith Schreiman; Scott Remick
Journal:  W V Med J       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

6.  Change in Breast Cancer Screening Intervals Since the 2009 USPSTF Guideline.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Robert F Arao; Rebecca A Hubbard; Brian L Sprague; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Jennifer S Haas; Louise Henderson; Deidre Hill; Christoph I Lee; Anna N A Tosteson; Tracy Onega
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Update on mammography trends: comparisons of rates in 2000, 2005, and 2008.

Authors:  Nancy Breen; Jane F Gentleman; Jeannine S Schiller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Multilevel Predictors of Continued Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening Among Women Ages 50-74 Years in a Screening Population.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Tracy Onega; Marilyn M Schapira; Anne Marie McCarthy; Christopher I Li; Sally D Herschorn; Constance D Lehman; Karen J Wernli; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Breast cancer screening in an insured population: whom are we missing?

Authors:  Karin L Kempe; Rebecca Sam Larson; Susan Shetterley; Andra Wilkinson
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2013

10.  Predictors of Non-Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening among Hospitalized Women.

Authors:  Waseem Khaliq; Ali Aamar; Scott M Wright
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.