Literature DB >> 19754231

Challenges in measuring a new construct: perception of voluntariness for research and treatment decision making.

Victoria A Miller1, William W Reynolds, Richard F Ittenbach, Mary Frances Luce, Tom L Beauchamp, Robert M Nelson.   

Abstract

RELIABLE AND VALID MEASURES OF RELEVANT constructs are critical in the developing field of the empirical study of research ethics. The early phases of scale development for such constructs can be complex. We describe the methodological challenges of construct definition and operationalization and how we addressed them in our study to develop a measure of perception of voluntariness. We also briefly present our conceptual approach to the construct of voluntariness, which we defined as the perception of control over decision making. Our multifaceted approach to scale development ensured that we would develop a construct definition of sufficient breadth and depth, that our new measure of voluntariness would be applicable across disciplines, and that there was a clear link between our construct definition and items. The strategies discussed here can be adapted by other researchers who are considering a scale development study related to the empirical study of ethics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19754231      PMCID: PMC2896293          DOI: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.3.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  18 in total

Review 1.  Informed consent and the capacity for voluntarism.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Development and pilot testing of a decision aid for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ann Cranney; Annette M O'Connor; Mary J Jacobsen; Peter Tugwell; Jonathan D Adachi; Daylily S Ooi; Lisa Waldegger; Rose Goldstein; George A Wells
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-07

3.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

Authors:  D T CAMPBELL; D W FISKE
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Multidimensional assessment of coping: a critical evaluation.

Authors:  N S Endler; J D Parker
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-05

Review 6.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.

Authors:  J B Rotter
Journal:  Psychol Monogr       Date:  1966

7.  Two scales for measuring patients' perceptions for coercion during mental hospital admission.

Authors:  W Gardner; S K Hoge; N Bennett; L H Roth; C W Lidz; J Monahan; E P Mulvey
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  1993

8.  Conceptual complexity and construct validity.

Authors:  Robert E McGrath
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2005-10

9.  Validation of a decisional conflict scale.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales.

Authors:  K A Wallston; B S Wallston; R DeVellis
Journal:  Health Educ Monogr       Date:  1978
View more
  5 in total

1.  Factors related to voluntary parental decision-making in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Robert M Nelson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Relationship of external influence to parental distress in decision making regarding children with a life-threatening illness.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Mary Frances Luce; Robert M Nelson
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2011-06-21

3.  The decision making control instrument to assess voluntary consent.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Richard F Ittenbach; Diana Harris; William W Reynolds; Tom L Beauchamp; Mary Frances Luce; Robert M Nelson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Perceptions of academic health science research center personnel regarding informed consent processes and therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  Teresa W Atz; Robert M Sade; Pamela H Williams
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Examining the language demands of informed consent documents in patient recruitment to cancer trials using tools from corpus and computational linguistics.

Authors:  Talia Isaacs; Jamie Murdoch; Zsófia Demjén; Fiona Stevenson
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2020-10-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.