| Literature DB >> 19753377 |
Tsuneomi Kawasaki1, Christiane Hohberger, Yuko Araki, Kunihiko Hatase, Klaus Beckerle, Jun Okuda, Kenso Soai.
Abstract
Chiral isotactic polystyrenes induce the enantioselective addition of diisopropylzinc to pyrimidine-5-carbaldehyde, affording the enantiomerically enriched pyrimidyl alkanol with the corresponding absolute configuration to that of cryptochiral polystyrenes in conjunction with asymmetric autocatalysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19753377 PMCID: PMC2898645 DOI: 10.1039/b912813a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) ISSN: 1359-7345 Impact factor: 6.222
Fig. 1Cryptochirality in isotactic polystyrene 1.
Fig. 2Synthesis of polystyrene 1 and the structure of the (OSSO)-type chiral ligand 2.
Scheme 1Enantioselective addition of iPr2Zn to aldehyde 3 induced by homochiral polystyrene 1, followed by asymmetric autocatalytic amplification of enantiomeric purity.
Chiral recognition of cryptochirality in isotactic polystyrene 1 and ent-1 by asymmetric autocatalysis
| Entry | Optically inactive isotactic polystyrene | Catalyst used for synthesis | 5-Pyrimidyl alkanol | ||
| Isolated yield (%) | Ee (%) | Config. | |||
| 1 | (Δ, | 85 | 15 | ||
| 2 | (Λ, | 89 | 5 | ||
| 3 | (Δ, | 82 | 6 | ||
| 4 | (Λ, | 88 | 4 | ||
| 5 | (Δ, | 83 | 1.4 | ||
| 6 | (Λ, | 83 | 1.1 | ||
| 7 | (Δ, | 89 | 3 | ||
| 8 | (Λ, | 84 | 3 | ||
| 9 | (Δ, | 91 | 1.3 | ||
| 10 | (Λ, | 88 | 3 | ||
The molar ratio of polystyrene 1 : pyrimidine-5-carbaldehyde 3 : iPr2Zn = 0.018 : 0.525 : 1.18 (mmol). The general procedure for asymmetric autocatalysis (Table 1, entry 1) is as follows: iPr2Zn (0.08 mmol, 0.8 mL; 1.0 M toluene solution) was added dropwise to a toluene (0.75 mL) solution of polystyrene 1 (10 mg, ca. 0.018 mmol). To this solution was added a toluene (0.25 mL) solution of aldehyde 3 (4.7 mg, 0.025 mmol) over a period of 1.5 h at 0 °C. After stirring the mixture for 15 h, toluene (1 mL) and iPr2Zn (0.3 mmol, 0.3 mL; 1.0 M toluene solution) were then added at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. A toluene (0.75 mL) solution of 3 (18.8 mg, 0.1 mmol) was slowly added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 1.5 h. Then, toluene (5.0 mL), iPr2Zn (0.8 mmol, 0.8 mL; 1.0 M toluene solution) and a toluene (2.0 mL) solution of 3 (75.3 mg, 0.4 mmol) were added successively at 0 °C. After stirring the mixture for 2.5 h, the reaction was quenched with HCl (1 M, 3 mL) and neutralized with a saturated NaHCO3 solution (9 mL). The mixture was then filtered through Celite and the filtrate was extracted with AcOEt (three times). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the residue by silica gel column chromatography on silica gel (hexane–AcOEt, 3 : 1, v/v) afforded the (S)-pyrimidyl alkanol 4 (103.1 mg, 0.444 mmol) in 85% yield. The ee value was determined to be 15% by HPLC, using a chiral stationary phase (Daicel Chiralpak IB 4.6Φ× 250 mm, 254 nm UV detector, room temperature, eluent: 5% 2-propanol in hexane (v/v), 1.0 mL min–1, retention time: 11 min for (S)-4 and 16 min for (R)-4).
For the synthesis and properties of 1, see ref. 7. M n values are 6108 g mol–1 for 1 and 6006 g mol–1 for ent-1.
The ee value was determined by HPLC using a chiral stationary phase.
(R,R)-Bis(phenol) 5, which is a chiral organic part of catalyst (Λ,R,R)-2 was mixed with the polystyrene 1, and (R,R)-5 and polystyrene 1 were separated again using silica gel column chromatography before use as a chiral initiator of asymmetric autocatalysis. See also ref. 16.
(S,S)-Bis(phenol) 5 was mixed with the polystyrene ent-1, and (S,S)-5 and ent-1 are separated again using silica gel column chromatography before use as a chiral initiator of asymmetric autocatalysis. See also ref. 16.
Chiral recognition of cryptochirality of isotactic polystyrene 1 followed by consecutive asymmetric autocatalysis with amplification of enantiomeric excess
| Entry | Optically inactive isotactic polystyrene | Catalyst used for synthesis | 5-Pyrimidyl alkanol | ||
| Isolated yield (%) | Ee (%) | Config. | |||
| 1 | (Δ, | 93 | 87 | ||
| 2 | (Λ, | 85 | 77 | ||
| 3 | (Δ, | 88 | 67 | ||
| 4 | (Λ, | 87 | 84 | ||
| 5 | (Δ, | 93 | 78 | ||
| 6 | (Λ, | 93 | 63 | ||
| 7 | (Δ, | 94 | 86 | ||
| 8 | (Λ, | 91 | 69 | ||
| 9 | (Δ, | 99 | 94 | ||
| 10 | (Λ, | 99 | 92 | ||
On completion of the general experimental procedure, an additional two cycles of asymmetric autocatalysis with amplification of ee were performed. See ref. 13.
See Table 1, footnote b.
See Table 1, footnote c.
On completion of the general experimental procedure, an additional three cycles of asymmetric autocatalytic amplification were performed. See ref. 13.