Literature DB >> 19752420

A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone with standard care to treat vision loss associated with macular Edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: the Standard Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) study report 6.

Ingrid U Scott1, Michael S Ip, Paul C VanVeldhuisen, Neal L Oden, Barbara A Blodi, Marian Fisher, Clement K Chan, Victor H Gonzalez, Lawrence J Singerman, Michael Tolentino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 1-mg and 4-mg doses of preservative-free intravitreal triamcinolone with standard care (grid photocoagulation in eyes without dense macular hemorrhage and deferral of photocoagulation until hemorrhage clears in eyes with dense macular hemorrhage) for eyes with vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
METHODS: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial of 411 participants. Main Outcome Measure Gain in visual acuity letter score of 15 or more from baseline to month 12.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent, 26%, and 27% of participants achieved the primary outcome in the standard care, 1-mg, and 4-mg groups, respectively. None of the pairwise comparisons between the 3 groups was statistically significant at month 12. The rates of elevated intraocular pressure and cataract were similar for the standard care and 1-mg groups, but higher in the 4-mg group.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference identified in visual acuity at 12 months for the standard care group compared with the triamcinolone groups; however, rates of adverse events (particularly elevated intraocular pressure and cataract) were highest in the 4-mg group. Application to Clinical Practice Grid photocoagulation as applied in the SCORE Study remains the standard care for patients with vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to BRVO who have characteristics similar to participants in the SCORE-BRVO trial. Grid photocoagulation should remain the benchmark against which other treatments are compared in clinical trials for eyes with vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to BRVO. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00105027.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19752420      PMCID: PMC2806600          DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  54 in total

1.  The efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  A Ozkiris; C Evereklioglu; K Erkiliç; O Ilhan
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.597

2.  New therapy for central retinal vein occlusion: are intravitreal steroids a possible answer?

Authors:  Mark S Blumenkranz
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-02

3.  Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for macular edema associated with diabetic retinopathy and venous occlusive disease: it's time for clinical trials.

Authors:  Harry W Flynn; Ingrid U Scott
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-02

4.  Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in patients with macular oedema due to branch retinal vein occlusion: a pilot study.

Authors:  Katharina Krepler; Erdem Ergun; Stefan Sacu; Sibylla Richter-Müksch; Julia Wagner; Michael Stur; Andreas Wedrich
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2005-10

5.  Intravitreal versus retrobulbar injections of triamcinolone for macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Hideyuki Hayashi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Presumed sterile endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection.

Authors:  Darius M Moshfeghi; Peter K Kaiser; Sophie J Bakri; Richard S Kaiser; Raj K Maturi; Jonathan E Sears; Ingrid U Scott; Jonathan Belmont; Paul M Beer; Hugo Quiroz-Mercado; William F Mieler
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

7.  Early treatment of cystoid macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide.

Authors:  Meher Yepremyan; Fleming D Wertz; Tim Tivnan; Laura Eversman; Jeffrey L Marx
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

8.  Problems with attempted chorioretinal venous anastomosis by laser for nonischemic CRVO and BRVO.

Authors:  Tayfun Bavbek; Ozlem Yenice; Okan Toygar
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.250

9.  Intravitreal triamcinolone as primary treatment of cystoid macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Henry Lee; Gaurav K Shah
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Branch retinal vein occlusion treated by intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide.

Authors:  J B Jonas; I Akkoyun; B Kamppeter; I Kreissig; R F Degenring
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  148 in total

1.  Baseline predictors of visual acuity and retinal thickness outcomes in patients with retinal vein occlusion: Standard Care Versus COrticosteroid for REtinal Vein Occlusion Study report 10.

Authors:  Ingrid U Scott; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Neal L Oden; Michael S Ip; Barbara A Blodi; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Geoff Cohen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Prospective multicenter study of visual outcomes following three different treatments for macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion: a study by the Japanese BRVO study group.

Authors:  Seiyo Harino; Kenichiro Bessho; Teruyo Kida
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Semiautomated intraocular laser surgery using handheld instruments.

Authors:  Brian C Becker; Robert A MacLachlan; Louis A Lobes; Cameron N Riviere
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  Association of outer retinal layer morphology with visual acuity in patients with retinal vein occlusion: SCORE Study Report 13.

Authors:  A Domalpally; Q Peng; R Danis; B Blodi; I U Scott; M Ip
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Current practice in the management of branch retinal vein occlusion in Japan: Survey results of retina specialists in Japan.

Authors:  Yuichiro Ogura; Mineo Kondo; Kazuaki Kadonosono; Masahiko Shimura; Motohiro Kamei; Akitaka Tsujikawa
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  The therapeutic potential of intraocular depot steroid systems: developments aimed at prolonging duration of efficacy.

Authors:  Martin M Nentwich; Michael W Ulbig
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Comparison of immediate versus deferred intravitreal Bevacizumab in macular oedema due to branch retinal vein occlusion: a pilot study.

Authors:  M A Khan; Varakutti Mallika; Dattakiran Joshi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Baseline characteristics and response to treatment of participants with hemiretinal compared with branch retinal or central retinal vein occlusion in the standard care vs corticosteroid for retinal vein occlusion (SCORE) study: SCORE study report 14.

Authors:  Ingrid U Scott; Paul C Vanveldhuisen; Neal L Oden; Michael S Ip; Amitha Domalpally; Bernard H Doft; Michael J Elman; Barbara A Blodi
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12

9.  [Intravitreal treatment of patients with branch retinal vein occlusion depending on the duration of macular edema].

Authors:  M Rehak; E Spies; M Scholz; P Wiedemann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Influence of retinal ischemia on macular function after pars plana vitrectomy for macular edema with branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Hidetaka Noma; Katsunori Shimada; Tatsuya Mimura
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.