Literature DB >> 15953425

Intravitreal versus retrobulbar injections of triamcinolone for macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion.

Ken Hayashi1, Hideyuki Hayashi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the short-term effect of intravitreal versus retrobulbar injection of triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of macular edema caused by branch retinal vein occlusion.
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: Sixty eyes of 60 patients who had macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion were randomly assigned to receive a single intravitreal injection (4 mg) or repeated retrobulbar injections (40 mg, three times) of triamcinolone. These injections (first injection in the retrobulbar group) were given approximately 1 week after focal laser photocoagulation. Using optical coherence tomography, the central retinal (foveal) thickness and total macular volume were measured before and at 1 and 3 months after injection. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and the incidence of reinjection were also examined. Fifty-two patients (86.7%) completed the 3-month follow-up.
RESULTS: The mean foveal thickness and total macular volume decreased significantly after either intravitreal or repeated retrobulbar triamcinolone injections. Foveal thickness and macular volume were significantly less after intravitreal injection than after repeated retrobulbar injections, although there had been no significant differences at baseline. The percent reductions in foveal thickness and macular volume were also greater after intravitreal injection than after retrobulbar injections. Improvement in visual acuity was significantly better after intravitreal injection than after the retrobulbar injections. The incidence of intraocular pressure rise (to > or =20 mm Hg) was greater in the intravitreal group than in the retrobulbar group, but this was readily controlled by the use of antiglaucoma medications. After completion of the 3-month follow-up, 24 patients (46.2%) underwent reinjection. The need for reinjections was significantly greater in the retrobulbar group than in the intravitreal group (P = .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: A single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone is significantly more effective than are repeated retrobulbar injections in reducing macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion, and leads to greater improvement in visual acuity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15953425     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.12.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  12 in total

Review 1.  The therapeutic potential of intraocular depot steroid systems: developments aimed at prolonging duration of efficacy.

Authors:  Martin M Nentwich; Michael W Ulbig
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Intravitreous bevacizumab in the treatment of macular edema from branch retinal vein occlusion and hemisphere retinal vein occlusion (an AOS thesis).

Authors:  Gary Edd Fish
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2008

3.  Combined intravitreal triamcinolone injection and laser photocoagulation in eyes with persistent macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Juliane Riese; Vlassis Loukopoulos; Cornelia Meier; Melanie Timmermann; Heinrich Gerding
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone with standard care to treat vision loss associated with macular Edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: the Standard Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) study report 6.

Authors:  Ingrid U Scott; Michael S Ip; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Neal L Oden; Barbara A Blodi; Marian Fisher; Clement K Chan; Victor H Gonzalez; Lawrence J Singerman; Michael Tolentino
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09

5.  The effect of povidone iodine flush versus drops on conjunctival colonization before intravitreal injections.

Authors:  Ammar Safar; Monica C Dellimore
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Combination therapy of intravitreal bevacizumab with single simultaneous posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  J Moon; M Kim; M Sagong
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Ocular microcirculation changes, measured with laser speckle flowgraphy and optical coherence tomography angiography, in branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema treated by ranibizumab.

Authors:  Toshifumi Asano; Hiroshi Kunikata; Masayuki Yasuda; Koji M Nishiguchi; Toshiaki Abe; Toru Nakazawa
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  SCORE Study report 1: baseline associations between central retinal thickness and visual acuity in patients with retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Ingrid U Scott; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Neal L Oden; Michael S Ip; Barbara A Blodi; J Michael Jumper; Maria Figueroa
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Early versus late intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Joo Youn Oh; Je Hyun Seo; Jae Kyoun Ahn; Jang Won Heo; Hum Chung
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03

Review 10.  Branch retinal vein occlusion: pathogenesis, visual prognosis, and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Jiri Rehak; Matus Rehak
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.424

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.