Literature DB >> 19751918

Current Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: methods and placebo outcomes.

Lon S Schneider1, Mary Sano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Eighteen-month-long randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials are common for phase II and phase III drug development for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Yet, no 18-month trial has shown statistically significant outcomes favoring the test drug. We examined characteristics and underlying assumptions of these trials by assessing the placebo groups.
METHODS: We searched the clinicaltrials.gov registry for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials for AD of at least 18-month duration and extracted demographic, clinical, and trials characteristics, and change in main outcomes from the placebo groups. We obtained additional information from presentations, abstracts, publications, and sponsors.
RESULTS: Of 23 trials identified, 11 were completed and had baseline data available; nine had follow-up data available; 17 were phase III. General inclusion criteria were very similar except that minimum Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores varied from 12 to 20. Sample sizes ranged from 402 to 1,684 for phase III trials and 80 to 400 for phase II. Cholinesterase inhibitor use was from 53% to 100%, and memantine use was from 13.5% to 78%. The AD Assessment Scale-cognitive (ADAS-cog) was the co-primary outcome in all trials; and activities of daily living, global severity, or global change ratings were the other co-primaries. APOE epsilon4 genotype carriers ranged from 58% to 67%; mean baseline ADAS-cog was 17.8 to 24.2. ADAS-cog worsening in the placebo groups during 18 months ranged from 4.34 to 9.10, with standard deviations from 8.17 to 9.39, increasing during 18 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion criteria are essentially similar to earlier 6-month and 12-month trials in which cholinesterase inhibitors were not allowed, as were mean ADAS-cog rates of change. Yet increasing variability and relatively little change overall in the ADAS-cog placebo groups, eg, about 25% of patients do not worsen by more than 1 point, might make it more unlikely than previously assumed that a modestly effective drug can be reliably recognized, especially when the drug might work only to attenuate decline in function and not to improve function. These observations would be strengthened by pooling individual trials data, and pharmaceutical sponsors should participate in such efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19751918      PMCID: PMC3321732          DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.07.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimers Dement        ISSN: 1552-5260            Impact factor:   21.566


  21 in total

1.  Clinical relevance on Alzheimer's disease endpoints.

Authors:  C Sampaio
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  An inventory to assess activities of daily living for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study.

Authors:  D Galasko; D Bennett; M Sano; C Ernesto; R Thomas; M Grundman; S Ferris
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.703

3.  Development of cognitive instruments for use in clinical trials of antidementia drugs: additions to the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale that broaden its scope. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study.

Authors:  R C Mohs; D Knopman; R C Petersen; S H Ferris; C Ernesto; M Grundman; M Sano; L Bieliauskas; D Geldmacher; C Clark; L J Thal
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.703

4.  Development of a functional measure for persons with Alzheimer's disease: the disability assessment for dementia.

Authors:  I Gélinas; L Gauthier; M McIntyre; S Gauthier
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

5.  The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules.

Authors:  J C Morris
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Optimal design of clinical trials for drugs designed to slow the course of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Richard C Mohs; Claudia Kawas; Maria C Carrillo
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 21.566

7.  High-dose B vitamin supplementation and cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paul S Aisen; Lon S Schneider; Mary Sano; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Christopher H van Dyck; Myron F Weiner; Teodoro Bottiglieri; Shelia Jin; Karen T Stokes; Ronald G Thomas; Leon J Thal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Long-term changes in ADAS-cog: what is clinically relevant for disease modifying trials in Alzheimer?

Authors:  B Vellas; S Andrieu; C Cantet; J F Dartigues; S Gauthier
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 9.  Prevention therapeutics of dementia.

Authors:  Lon S Schneider
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 21.566

10.  Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis. APOE and Alzheimer Disease Meta Analysis Consortium.

Authors:  L A Farrer; L A Cupples; J L Haines; B Hyman; W A Kukull; R Mayeux; R H Myers; M A Pericak-Vance; N Risch; C M van Duijn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Oct 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  56 in total

1.  Preventing cognitive decline in older African Americans with mild cognitive impairment: design and methods of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Barry W Rovner; Robin J Casten; Mark T Hegel; Benjamin E Leiby
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Efficacy of a medical food on cognition in Alzheimer's disease: results from secondary analyses of a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  P J G H Kamphuis; F R J Verhey; M G M Olde Rikkert; J W R Twisk; S H N Swinkels; P Scheltens
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Requiring an amyloid-beta1-42 biomarker for prodromal Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment does not lead to more efficient clinical trials.

Authors:  Lon S Schneider; Richard E Kennedy; Gary R Cutter
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 21.566

4.  Rosiglitazone monotherapy in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.

Authors:  Michael Gold; Claire Alderton; Marina Zvartau-Hind; Sally Egginton; Ann M Saunders; Michael Irizarry; Suzanne Craft; Gary Landreth; Ulla Linnamägi; Sharon Sawchak
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.959

Review 5.  Integrating ADNI results into Alzheimer's disease drug development programs.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Cummings
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  Novel approaches to incorporating pharmacoeconomic studies into phase III clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  H Fillit; J Cummings; P Neumann; T McLaughlin; P Salavtore; C Leibman
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 7.  The amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer's disease: an appraisal for the development of therapeutics.

Authors:  Eric Karran; Marc Mercken; Bart De Strooper
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  Advances in designs for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cummings; Heath Gould; Kate Zhong
Journal:  Am J Neurodegener Dis       Date:  2012-11-18

9.  Effect of tarenflurbil on cognitive decline and activities of daily living in patients with mild Alzheimer disease: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Lon S Schneider; David A Amato; Andrew P Beelen; Gordon Wilcock; Edward A Swabb; Kenton H Zavitz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Was phenserine a failure or were investigators mislead by methods?

Authors:  Robert E Becker; Nigel H Greig
Journal:  Curr Alzheimer Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.