Literature DB >> 20922340

Novel approaches to incorporating pharmacoeconomic studies into phase III clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease.

H Fillit1, J Cummings, P Neumann, T McLaughlin, P Salavtore, C Leibman.   

Abstract

The societal and individual costs of Alzheimer's disease are significant, worldwide. As the world ages, these costs are increasing rapidly, while health systems face finite budgets. As a result, many regulators and payers will require or at least consider phase III cost-effectiveness data (in addition to safety and efficacy data) for drug approval and reimbursement, increasing the risks and costs of drug development. Incorporating pharmacoeconomic studies in phase III clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease presents a number of challenges. We propose several specific suggestions to improve the design of pharmacoeconomic studies in phase III clinical trials. We propose that acute episodes of care are key outcome measures for pharmacoeconomic studies. To improve the possibility of detecting a pharmacoeconomic impact in phase III, we suggest several strategies including; study designs for enrichment of pharmacoeconomic outcomes that include co-morbidity of patients; reducing variability of care that can affect pharmacoeconomic outcomes through standardized care management; employing administrative claims data to better capture meaningful pharmacoeconomic data; and extending clinical trials in open label follow-up periods in which pharmacoeconomic data are captured electronically by administrative claims. Specific aspects of power analysis for pharmacoeconomic studies are presented. The particular pharmacoeconomic challenges caused by the use of biomarkers in clinical trials, the increasing use of multinational studies, and the pharmacoeconomic challenges presented by biologicals in development for Alzheimer's disease are discussed. In summary, since we are entering an era in which pharmacoeconomic studies will be essential in drug development for supporting regulatory approval, payor reimbursement and integration of new therapies into clinical care, we must consider the design and incorporation of pharmacoeconomic studies in phase III clinical trials more seriously and more creatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20922340     DOI: 10.1007/s12603-010-0310-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging        ISSN: 1279-7707            Impact factor:   4.075


  77 in total

1.  Medicare and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Allison B Rosen; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Cost-effectiveness as an outcome in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Mark A Hlatky; Douglas K Owens; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Executive function, working memory, and medication adherence among older adults.

Authors:  Kathleen Insel; Daniel Morrow; Barbara Brewer; Aurelio Figueredo
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Defining and labeling disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Cummings
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 21.566

5.  Cost-effectiveness of biologics in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Axel Finckh; Nick Bansback; Matthew H Liang
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Impact of donepezil use in routine clinical practice on health care costs in patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias enrolled in a large medicare managed care plan: a case-control study.

Authors:  Shaoli Lu; Jerrold Hill; Howard Fillit
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Pharmacother       Date:  2005-06

7.  Predictive factors of hospitalizations in Alzheimer's disease: a two-year prospective study in 686 patients of the REAL.FR study.

Authors:  T Voisin; S Andrieu; C Cantet; B Vellas
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.075

8.  Standardizing assessment of elderly people in acute care: the interRAI Acute Care instrument.

Authors:  Len C Gray; Roberto Bernabei; Katherine Berg; Harriet Finne-Soveri; Brant E Fries; John P Hirdes; Pálmi V Jónsson; John N Morris; Knight Steel; Sergio Ariño-Blasco
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Burden of Alzheimer's disease and association with negative health outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel C Malone; Trent P McLaughlin; Peter M Wahl; Christopher Leibman; H Michael Arrighi; Mark J Cziraky; Lisa M Mucha
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Healthcare costs and utilization for Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer's.

Authors:  Yang Zhao; Tzu-Chun Kuo; Sharada Weir; Marilyn S Kramer; Arlene S Ash
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  3 in total

1.  Health economics and health policy issues in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  T Rapp
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Advances in designs for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cummings; Heath Gould; Kate Zhong
Journal:  Am J Neurodegener Dis       Date:  2012-11-18

3.  Methodological challenges in assessing the impact of comorbidities on costs in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.

Authors:  Kristin Kahle-Wrobleski; Howard Fillit; Jonathan Kurlander; Catherine Reed; Mark Belger
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-11-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.