Literature DB >> 19750032

Effect of prescription copayments on adherence and treatment failure with oral antidiabetic medications.

John Barron, Peter Wahl, Maxine Fisher, Craig Plauschinat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that an increase in cost sharing by patients for medications results in reduced medication use. The purpose of our study was to determine whether the amount of members' copayments predicted oral antidiabetic treatment failure in a managed care population and to analyze the relationship between copayments, adherence to therapy, and hemoglobin A(1c) levels in patients with type-2 diabetes.
METHODS: Health plan members 18 years of age or older with type-2 diabetes and who were newly initiated on an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) between January 1, 2002, and January 31, 2006, were identified from a managed care population in the U.S. Members were required to have continuous eligibility for six or more months before and 12 months after the index prescription and were placed into four treatment groups. These patients were followed for one year. The time during which they took the index OAD was measured until treatment failure (discontinuation of therapy or a switch of the index OAD) or censoring of patient data. The medication possession ratio (MPR), which was used to calculate adherence, was defined as the number of days that a patient had a supply of the index OAD during the year after the index fill, divided by 365 days. Copays were identified for every prescription, and the amount for each 30 days of treatment was calculated. We used multivariate analyses to assess the impact of copays on treatment failure, adjusting for differences in member characteristics.
RESULTS: Adherence was poor, with an overall mean MPR of 0.57, decreasing from 0.58 for the group with a copay of less than $10 to 0.52 for patients with a copay of $20 or more. Initial treatment failed for 13,091 patients (70%), with approximately 60% of all members discontinuing treatment. This discontinuation rate ranged from 55% in the lowest copayment group (below $10) to 67% in those with a copay of $30 or more. For every $10 increase in copay, OAD treatment was 26% more likely to fail (95% confidence interval, 22.3-29.8%; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Higher copays for health plan members were a significant predictor of treatment failure. With the increased trend toward more cost sharing by members of health plans, ongoing evaluation will be necessary to determine the impact on treatment persistence in patients with chronic conditions.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19750032      PMCID: PMC2730132     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  P T        ISSN: 1052-1372


  24 in total

1.  Oral antihyperglycemic medication nonadherence and subsequent hospitalization among individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Denys T Lau; David P Nau
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Relationship of glycemic control to total diabetes-related costs for managed care health plan members with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Sharashchandra Shetty; Kristina Secnik; Alan K Oglesby
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2005-09

4.  Impact of medication adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost.

Authors:  Michael C Sokol; Kimberly A McGuigan; Robert R Verbrugge; Robert S Epstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The cost to health plans of poor glycemic control.

Authors:  T P Gilmer; P J O'Connor; W G Manning; W A Rush
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 6.  A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes.

Authors:  Joyce A Cramer
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  The relationship between primary care physicians' adherence to guidelines for the treatment of diabetes and patient satisfaction: findings from a pilot study.

Authors:  Revital Gross; Hava Tabenkin; Avi Porath; Anthony Heymann; Miriam Greenstein; Boaz Porter; Ronit Matzliach
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Health economic benefits and quality of life during improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.

Authors:  M A Testa; D C Simonson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-04       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Predictors of medication adherence and associated health care costs in an older population with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Rajesh Balkrishnan; Rukmini Rajagopalan; Fabian T Camacho; Sally A Huston; Frederick T Murray; Roger T Anderson
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.393

View more
  12 in total

1.  Predictors of medication adherence in an urban Latino community with healthcare disparities.

Authors:  Jennifer A Colby; Fei Wang; Jyoti Chhabra; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-08

Review 2.  Overcoming obstacles in risk factor management in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Yehuda Handelsman; Paul S Jellinger
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  National Rates of Initiation and Intensification of Antidiabetic Therapy Among Patients With Commercial Insurance.

Authors:  Lauren G Gilstrap; Ateev Mehrotra; Barbara Bai; Sherri Rose; Rachel A Blair; Michael E Chernew
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Multinational Internet-based survey of patient preference for newer oral or injectable Type 2 diabetes medication.

Authors:  Marco Dacosta Dibonaventura; Jan-Samuel Wagner; Cynthia J Girman; Kimberly Brodovicz; Qiaoyi Zhang; Ying Qiu; Sri-Ram Pentakota; Larry Radican
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Analysis of treatment patterns and persistence on branded and generic medications in major depressive disorder using retrospective claims data.

Authors:  Caitlyn T Solem; Ahmed Shelbaya; Yin Wan; Chinmay G Deshpande; Jose Alvir; Elizabeth Pappadopulos
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.570

6.  Determining the prevalence and risk factors for prescription drug unaffordability.

Authors:  N S Donnenberg; I Hernandez; D P Normolle
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2021-06-29

Review 7.  Newborn screening 50 years later: access issues faced by adults with PKU.

Authors:  Susan A Berry; Christine Brown; Mitzie Grant; Carol L Greene; Elaina Jurecki; Jean Koch; Kathryn Moseley; Ruth Suter; Sandra C van Calcar; Judy Wiles; Stephen Cederbaum
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  The influence of health systems on hypertension awareness, treatment, and control: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Will Maimaris; Jared Paty; Pablo Perel; Helena Legido-Quigley; Dina Balabanova; Robby Nieuwlaat; Martin McKee
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Effect of Medication Copayment on Adherence and Discontinuation in Medicare Beneficiaries with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Administrative Claims Database Analysis.

Authors:  Manjiri D Pawaskar; Liou Xu; Yuexin Tang; Gary A Puckrein; Swapnil N Rajpathak; Bruce Stuart
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.945

10.  The effects of reimbursement reform of antidiabetic medicines from the patients' perspective - a survey among patients with type 2 diabetes in Finland.

Authors:  Taika Suviranta; Johanna Timonen; Janne Martikainen; Emma Aarnio
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.