Literature DB >> 16137213

Relationship of glycemic control to total diabetes-related costs for managed care health plan members with type 2 diabetes.

Sharashchandra Shetty1, Kristina Secnik, Alan K Oglesby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) is a well-established measure of glycemic control, and evidence suggests that maintaining an acceptable A1c level may be associated with lower treatment costs in adults with diabetes. Understanding the impact on total treatment costs of staying at the target A1c level is of great importance to managed care organizations. The goal of this study was to determine whether type 2 diabetes patients at or below the target A1c level of 7% had lower diabetes-related costs compared with patients above an A1c level of 7%.
METHODS: This study was a retrospective database analysis using eligibility data, medical and pharmacy claims data, and laboratory data from a large U.S. health care organization. Patients were included in the study if they had 2 or more claims for type 2 diabetes (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] codes 250.x0 or 250.x2) and at least 1 A1c value (first such date defined as the index date) during the 12-month period from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2002. Patients with 2 or more medical claims for type 1 diabetes (ICD-9-CM codes 250.x1 or 250.x3) were excluded from the study. Study patients were divided into 2 groups, those at the target A1c level (7%) and those at the above-target A1c level (>7%), and were followed for a period of 1 year after their index date. Demographic, clinical, and cost variables were extracted from the administrative database. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to compare treatment costs between patients at the target A1c level and patients above target level.
RESULTS: A total of 3,121 patients (46.0%) were identified as being at the target A1c level, and 3,659 patients (54%) were identified as being above the target A1c level during the study period. After controlling for confounding factors, the predicted total diabetes-related cost for the above-target group during the 1-year follow-up period was 1,540 US dollars per patient, 32% higher than the total diabetes-related cost (1,171 US dollars) for the at-target group (P <0.001).
CONCLUSION: Results of this analysis suggest that managed care members with type 2 diabetes who stayed continuously at the target A1c level of 7% or less over a 1-year follow-up period incurred lower diabetes-related costs compared with managed care members with type 2 diabetes who were continuously over the target A1c level of 7%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16137213     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2005.11.7.559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm        ISSN: 1083-4087


  25 in total

1.  Bad medicine: there is a lot wrong with diabetes care in the United States.

Authors:  John P Sheehan
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2010-03

2.  Variation in Diabetes Management: A National Assessment of Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  John W Peabody; Enrico de Belen; Jeffrey R Dahlen; Maria Czarina Acelajado; Mary T Tran; David R Paculdo
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-07-07

3.  Pancreatitis, pancreatic, and thyroid cancer with glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies.

Authors:  Michael Elashoff; Aleksey V Matveyenko; Belinda Gier; Robert Elashoff; Peter C Butler
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Impact of glycemic control on healthcare resource utilization and costs of type 2 diabetes: current and future pharmacologic approaches to improving outcomes.

Authors:  Mary Ann Banerji; Jeffrey D Dunn
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2013-09

5.  The effect of Medicare Part D on drug and medical spending.

Authors:  Yuting Zhang; Julie M Donohue; Judith R Lave; Gerald O'Donnell; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Effect of prescription copayments on adherence and treatment failure with oral antidiabetic medications.

Authors:  John Barron; Peter Wahl; Maxine Fisher; Craig Plauschinat
Journal:  P T       Date:  2008-09

7.  Changes in Direct Medical Cost and Medications for Managing Diabetes in Beijing, China, 2016 to 2018: Electronic Insurance Data Analysis.

Authors:  Lixin Guo; Jie Zheng; Qi Pan; Qun Zhang; Yan Zhou; Weihao Wang; Lina Zhang; Solomon Tesfaye; Jie Zhang
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Association Between Sustained Glycated Hemoglobin Control and Healthcare Costs.

Authors:  Dt Juarez; R Goo; S Tokumaru; T Sentell; Jw Davis; Mm Mau
Journal:  Am J Pharm Benefits       Date:  2013

9.  Health insurance status and type associated with varying levels of glycemic control in the US: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Rebecca S Gold; Jonathan T Unkart; Robyn L McClelland; Alain G Bertoni; Matthew A Allison
Journal:  Prim Care Diabetes       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.459

10.  Glycemic control and diabetes-related health care costs in type 2 diabetes; retrospective analysis based on clinical and administrative databases.

Authors:  Luca Degli Esposti; Stefania Saragoni; Stefano Buda; Alessandra Sturani; Ezio Degli Esposti
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.