Literature DB >> 19749102

Acoustic behaviour of echolocating porpoises during prey capture.

Stacy L Deruiter1, Alexander Bahr, Marie-Anne Blanchet, Sabina Fobian Hansen, Jakob Højer Kristensen, Peter T Madsen, Peter L Tyack, Magnus Wahlberg.   

Abstract

Porpoise echolocation has been studied previously, mainly in target detection experiments using stationed animals and steel sphere targets, but little is known about the acoustic behaviour of free-swimming porpoises echolocating for prey. Here, we used small onboard sound and orientation recording tags to study the echolocation behaviour of free-swimming trained porpoises as they caught dead, freely drifting fish. We analysed porpoise echolocation behaviour leading up to and following prey capture events, including variability in echolocation in response to vision restriction, prey species, and individual porpoise tested. The porpoises produced echolocation clicks as they searched for the fish, followed by fast-repetition-rate clicks (echolocation buzzes) when acquiring prey. During buzzes, which usually began when porpoises were about 1-2 body lengths from prey, tag-recorded click levels decreased by about 10 dB, click rates increased to over 300 clicks per second, and variability in body orientation (roll) increased. Buzzes generally continued beyond the first contact with the fish, and often extended until or after the end of prey handling. This unexplained continuation of buzzes after prey capture raises questions about the function of buzzes, suggesting that in addition to providing detailed information on target location during the capture, they may serve additional purposes such as the relocation of potentially escaping prey. We conclude that porpoises display the same overall acoustic prey capture behaviour seen in larger toothed whales in the wild, albeit at a faster pace, clicking slowly during search and approach phases and buzzing during prey capture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19749102     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.030825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  16 in total

1.  Fast sensory-motor reactions in echolocating bats to sudden changes during the final buzz and prey intercept.

Authors:  Cornelia Geberl; Signe Brinkløv; Lutz Wiegrebe; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  High rates of vessel noise disrupt foraging in wild harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena).

Authors:  Danuta Maria Wisniewska; Mark Johnson; Jonas Teilmann; Ursula Siebert; Anders Galatius; Rune Dietz; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Echolocation in Blainville's beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris).

Authors:  P T Madsen; N Aguilar de Soto; P Arranz; M Johnson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Range-dependent flexibility in the acoustic field of view of echolocating porpoises (Phocoena phocoena).

Authors:  Danuta M Wisniewska; John M Ratcliffe; Kristian Beedholm; Christian B Christensen; Mark Johnson; Jens C Koblitz; Magnus Wahlberg; Peter T Madsen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  The importance of ambient sound level to characterise anuran habitat.

Authors:  Sandra Goutte; Alain Dubois; Frédéric Legendre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Acoustic and foraging behavior of a Baird's beaked whale, Berardius bairdii, exposed to simulated sonar.

Authors:  A K Stimpert; S L DeRuiter; B L Southall; D J Moretti; E A Falcone; J A Goldbogen; A Friedlaender; G S Schorr; J Calambokidis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Ultrasonic predator-prey interactions in water-convergent evolution with insects and bats in air?

Authors:  Maria Wilson; Magnus Wahlberg; Annemarie Surlykke; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Sperm whale predator-prey interactions involve chasing and buzzing, but no acoustic stunning.

Authors:  A Fais; M Johnson; M Wilson; N Aguilar Soto; P T Madsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Automated classification of dolphin echolocation click types from the Gulf of Mexico.

Authors:  Kaitlin E Frasier; Marie A Roch; Melissa S Soldevilla; Sean M Wiggins; Lance P Garrison; John A Hildebrand
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Oilbirds produce echolocation signals beyond their best hearing range and adjust signal design to natural light conditions.

Authors:  Signe Brinkløv; Coen P H Elemans; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.