OBJECTIVE: To determine if processes and outcomes of diabetes care improved between 2000 and 2006 in a managed care health plan with a comprehensive diabetes disease management program. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. METHODS: A total of 1650 randomly selected members with diabetes mellitus completed surveys in 2000, and 1256 randomly selected members with diabetes completed surveys in 2006. Survey and medical record data were analyzed using multivariable regression and predictive probabilities adjusted for age, education, and comorbidities. RESULTS: In 2006, patients were more likely to have proteinuria assessed (85% vs 74% in 2000), foot examinations performed (90% vs 86%), glycosylated hemoglobin levels measured (94% vs 87%), lipids measured (81% vs 70%), aspirin use recommended (67% vs 56%), and influenza immunizations administered (70% vs 63%). Glycosylated hemoglobin levels decreased by 0.60% (P <.001), systolic blood pressures by 3 mm Hg (P = .002), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 18 mg/dL (P <.001). Those who were continuously enrolled in the health plan were significantly more likely to report having had dilated retinal examinations (P = .003), aspirin use recommendations (P = .049), influenza immunizations (P = .004), and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (by 6 mg/dL, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a disease management program was associated with substantial improvements in processes and outcomes of diabetes care over 6 years. Although secular trend likely contributed somewhat, improvement in other measures was significantly associated with duration of enrollment in the health plan, making secular trend an unlikely explanation for all of our findings.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if processes and outcomes of diabetes care improved between 2000 and 2006 in a managed care health plan with a comprehensive diabetes disease management program. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. METHODS: A total of 1650 randomly selected members with diabetes mellitus completed surveys in 2000, and 1256 randomly selected members with diabetes completed surveys in 2006. Survey and medical record data were analyzed using multivariable regression and predictive probabilities adjusted for age, education, and comorbidities. RESULTS: In 2006, patients were more likely to have proteinuria assessed (85% vs 74% in 2000), foot examinations performed (90% vs 86%), glycosylated hemoglobin levels measured (94% vs 87%), lipids measured (81% vs 70%), aspirin use recommended (67% vs 56%), and influenza immunizations administered (70% vs 63%). Glycosylated hemoglobin levels decreased by 0.60% (P <.001), systolic blood pressures by 3 mm Hg (P = .002), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 18 mg/dL (P <.001). Those who were continuously enrolled in the health plan were significantly more likely to report having had dilated retinal examinations (P = .003), aspirin use recommendations (P = .049), influenza immunizations (P = .004), and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (by 6 mg/dL, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a disease management program was associated with substantial improvements in processes and outcomes of diabetes care over 6 years. Although secular trend likely contributed somewhat, improvement in other measures was significantly associated with duration of enrollment in the health plan, making secular trend an unlikely explanation for all of our findings.
Authors: Carol M Mangione; Robert B Gerzoff; David F Williamson; W Neil Steers; Eve A Kerr; Arleen F Brown; Beth E Waitzfelder; David G Marrero; R Adams Dudley; Catherine Kim; William Herman; Theodore J Thompson; Monika M Safford; Joe V Selby Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-07-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jinan B Saaddine; Betsy Cadwell; Edward W Gregg; Michael M Engelgau; Frank Vinicor; Giuseppina Imperatore; K M Venkat Narayan Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-04-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Marcia M Ward; Jon W Yankey; Thomas E Vaughn; Bonnie J BootsMiller; Stephen D Flach; Karl F Welke; Jane F Pendergast; Jonathan Perlin; Bradley N Doebbeling Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: L Hansson; A Zanchetti; S G Carruthers; B Dahlöf; D Elmfeldt; S Julius; J Ménard; K H Rahn; H Wedel; S Westerling Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-06-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sandra L Jackson; Lisa R Staimez; Sandra Safo; Qi Long; Mary K Rhee; Solveig A Cunningham; Darin E Olson; Anne M Tomolo; Usha Ramakrishnan; Venkat K M Narayan; Lawrence S Phillips Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Joe V Selby; Julie A Schmittdiel; Bruce Fireman; Marc Jaffe; Laura J Ransom; Wendy Dyer; Connie S Uratsu; Mary E Reed; Eve A Kerr; John Hsu Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-07-02 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Amber A W A van der Heijden; Martine C de Bruijne; Talitha L Feenstra; Jacqueline M Dekker; Caroline A Baan; Judith E Bosmans; Sandra D M Bot; Gé A Donker; Giel Nijpels Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 2.655