INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the expression profiles of excision repair crosscomplementation group 1 (ERCC1), x-ray repair crosscomplementation group 1 (XRCC1), and betaIII-tubulin between patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and those with metastatic lymph nodes and to identify the prognostic significance of each chemotherapy resistance protein. MATERIALS: Those who met the inclusion criteria were patients (1) with NSCLC, (2) with metastatic lymph nodes (N1 or N2), and (3) who underwent surgical resection followed by platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 82 patients were included in the study. The expression profile of each protein was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and compared according to tumor location. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 57.5 +/- 8.4 years. There were 30 N1 and 52 N2 patients. ERCC1 expression was upregulated in 55% and downregulated in 8% of metastatic lymph nodes, when compared with primary tumors (p < 0.05). XRCC1 was also upregulated in 56% and downregulated in 6% (p < 0.05). However, betaIII-tubulin was upregulated in 12% and downregulated in 45% of patients (p < 0.05). betaIII-tubulin expression in metastatic lymph nodes was greater in patients with adenocarcinoma than other cell types. Upregulation of ERCC1 in metastatic lymph nodes was a poor prognostic factor in N1 patients but not in N2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Significant changes in the expression profile of each protein were observed in metastatic lymph nodes. The resistance protein-guided treatment should be performed after integrative interpretation of expression profiles of each protein in both primary and metastatic sites.
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the expression profiles of excision repair crosscomplementation group 1 (ERCC1), x-ray repair crosscomplementation group 1 (XRCC1), and betaIII-tubulin between patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and those with metastatic lymph nodes and to identify the prognostic significance of each chemotherapy resistance protein. MATERIALS: Those who met the inclusion criteria were patients (1) with NSCLC, (2) with metastatic lymph nodes (N1 or N2), and (3) who underwent surgical resection followed by platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 82 patients were included in the study. The expression profile of each protein was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and compared according to tumor location. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 57.5 +/- 8.4 years. There were 30 N1 and 52 N2 patients. ERCC1 expression was upregulated in 55% and downregulated in 8% of metastatic lymph nodes, when compared with primary tumors (p < 0.05). XRCC1 was also upregulated in 56% and downregulated in 6% (p < 0.05). However, betaIII-tubulin was upregulated in 12% and downregulated in 45% of patients (p < 0.05). betaIII-tubulin expression in metastatic lymph nodes was greater in patients with adenocarcinoma than other cell types. Upregulation of ERCC1 in metastatic lymph nodes was a poor prognostic factor in N1 patients but not in N2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Significant changes in the expression profile of each protein were observed in metastatic lymph nodes. The resistance protein-guided treatment should be performed after integrative interpretation of expression profiles of each protein in both primary and metastatic sites.
Authors: Dana M Roque; Natalia Buza; Michelle Glasgow; Stefania Bellone; Ileana Bortolomai; Sara Gasparrini; Emiliano Cocco; Elena Ratner; Dan-Arin Silasi; Masoud Azodi; Thomas J Rutherford; Peter E Schwartz; Alessandro D Santin Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Eszter Podmaniczky; Katalin Fábián; Judit Pápay; Rita Puskás; Márton Gyulai; József Furák; László Tiszlavicz; György Losonczy; József Tímár; Judit Moldvay Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2014-09-07 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: D C Christoph; S Kasper; T C Gauler; C Loesch; M Engelhard; D Theegarten; C Poettgen; R Hepp; A Peglow; H Loewendick; S Welter; G Stamatis; F R Hirsch; M Schuler; W E E Eberhardt; J Wohlschlaeger Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 7.640