Literature DB >> 19745666

Follow-up of primary angle closure suspects after laser peripheral iridotomy using ultrasound biomicroscopy and A-scan biometry for a period of 2 years.

Krishna Kumar Ramani1, Baskaran Mani, Ronnie J George, Vijaya Lingam.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the morphologic changes in the anterior segment of primary angle closure suspects (PACS) who underwent laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) for a period of 2 years.
METHODS: PACS (n=82 eyes) of Asian Indian origin who attended the Glaucoma clinic of tertiary eye hospital underwent A-scan biometry and ultrasound biomicroscopy. Anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber angle (ACA), axial length, lens thickness, relative lens position, central corneal thickness, angle opening distance 500, trabecular-ciliary process distance, iris-ciliary process distance, and iris thickness were measured before LPI and after LPI at 1 week, 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, and 2 years. Variation in the parameters measured over a period of 2 years was analyzed.
RESULTS: Fifteen eyes out of 52 eyes developed into primary angle closure (PAC) with synechial changes. Univariate analysis for the predictive factors of PAC showed no significant association for age, sex, narrow angle, ultrasound biomicroscopy parameters, and vertical cup-disc ratio. When analyzed as continuous variables, decreasing ACA was significant risk factor (95% confidence interval: 0.703, 0.989, P=0.037). Iris-ciliary process distance, ACA, lens thickness, and angle opening distance 500 were the parameters that varied significantly (P<0.05) between "before LPI group" and "after LPI groups." None of the subjects developed increased intraocular pressure after laser iridotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: In this hospital-based study on the course of PACS subjects after LPI, as many as 28% progressed to PAC. Decreasing ACA was the predictive factor for the progression of PACS to PAC. There was no increase in intraocular pressure, history, or symptoms of acute attack of glaucoma among the study subjects after LPI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19745666     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318193c12d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of laser iridotomy using short duration 532-nm Nd: YAG laser (PASCAL) vs conventional laser in dark irides.

Authors:  Hye Jin Chung; Hae-Young Park; Su-Young Kim
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Evaluation of the efficacy of laser peripheral iridoplasty in reversing the darkroom provocative test result in Chinese patients with primary angle closure status post laser iridotomy.

Authors:  Ping Huang; Ling-Ling Wu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Effect of Laser Peripheral Iridotomy on Anterior Chamber Angle Anatomy in Primary Angle Closure Spectrum Eyes.

Authors:  Seema Kansara; Lauren S Blieden; Alice Z Chuang; Laura A Baker; Nicholas P Bell; Kimberly A Mankiewicz; Robert M Feldman
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Comparison of ultrasound biomicroscopy and spectral-domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography in evaluation of anterior segment after laser peripheral iridotomy.

Authors:  Xiao-Yun Ma; Dan Zhu; Jun Zou; Wen-Jie Zhang; Yi-Lin Cao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Functional evaluation of an iridotomy in primary angle closure eyes.

Authors:  Ramanjit Sihota; Karandeep Rishi; Geetha Srinivasan; Viney Gupta; Tanuj Dada; Kulwant Singh
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Potentially Missed Opportunities in Prevention of Acute Angle-Closure Crisis.

Authors:  Annie M Wu; Joshua D Stein; Manjool Shah
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 8.253

Review 7.  Lasers in Glaucoma: an Overview.

Authors:  Bhawesh Chandra Saha; Rashmi Kumari; Bibhuti Prasanna Sinha; Anita Ambasta; Sanjeev Kumar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Pentacam changes in primary angle-closure glaucoma after different lines of treatment.

Authors:  Tharwat H Mokbel; Abd-Elmonem Elhesy; Ahmed Alnagdy; Mohammed F Elashri; Ahmed M Eissa; Walid M Gaafar; Sherein M Hagras
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Ocular biometry in angle closure.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Razeghinejad; Mohammad Banifatemi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2013-01

Review 10.  An Indian perspective on primary angle closure and glaucoma.

Authors:  Ramanjit Sihota
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.