Literature DB >> 19741563

Myopia progression during three years of soft contact lens wear.

Adam Blacker1, G Lynn Mitchell, Mark A Bullimore, Bill Long, Joseph T Barr, Sally M Dillehay, Peter Bergenske, Peter Donshik, Glenda Secor, John Yoakum, Robin L Chalmers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of lens material alone on myopia progression in a multi-center non-randomized prospective study of daily wear hydrogel and continuous wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
METHODS: Refractive error data from completing subjects were collected during a 3-year study of 54 subjects wearing low-Dk/t hydrogel contact lenses for daily wear and 230 wearing silicone hydrogel contact lenses for up to 30 nights continuous wear. Univariate analysis of refractive error changes was first conducted on factors of lens type, age at baseline, and baseline refractive error. Multivariate analysis was then performed to control for potential confounders of age (categorical by decade and continuous), and baseline refractive error.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that refractive error changes were significantly affected by lens type (F = 78.2, p < 0.001, R = 0.218) and subject age (F = 131.2, p < 0.001, R = 0.319) but not baseline refractive error (F = 2.56, p = 0.11, R = 0.009). The model's overall R value is 0.376; the age-adjusted refractive error changes are +0.02 D for the silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers and -0.41 D for the hydrogel contact lenses for the 3-year follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: Subject age and lens type significantly influenced the degree of myopic progression, with younger subjects and low-Dk/t hydrogel contact lens wearers increasing more during the study. The Lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel lens material may contribute to less myopia progression in adult contact lens wearers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19741563      PMCID: PMC2974957          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181bab365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  10 in total

1.  Corneal curvature and refractive error changes associated with wearing hydrogel contact lenses.

Authors:  M G Harris; M D Sarver; K A Polse
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1975-05

2.  A retrospective study of myopia progression in adult contact lens wearers.

Authors:  Mark A Bullimore; Lisa A Jones; Melvin L Moeschberger; Karla Zadnik; Rick E Payor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The effect of changing from glasses to soft contact lenses on myopia progression in adolescents.

Authors:  George W Fulk; Lynn A Cyert; Donald E Parker; Roger W West
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Changes in myopia with low-Dk hydrogel and high-Dk silicone hydrogel extended wear.

Authors:  Isabelle Jalbert; Serina Stretton; Thomas Naduvilath; Brien Holden; Lisa Keay; Deborah Sweeney
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Refractive and biometric changes with silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

Authors:  Jacinto Santodomingo-Rubido; Bernard Gilmartin; James Wolffsohn
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Impact of previous extended and daily wear schedules on signs and symptoms with high Dk lotrafilcon A lenses.

Authors:  Robin L Chalmers; Sally Dillehay; Bill Long; Joseph T Barr; Peter Bergenske; Peter Donshik; Glenda Secor; John Yoakum
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Long-term clinical results: 3 years of up to 30-night continuous wear of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel and daily wear of low-Dk/t hydrogel lenses.

Authors:  Peter Bergenske; Bill Long; Sally Dillehay; Joseph T Barr; Peter Donshik; Glenda Secor; John Yoakum; Robin L Chalmers
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.018

8.  Adaptation to hydrogel contact lenses: variations in myopia and corneal curvature measurements.

Authors:  W A Barnett; R H Rengstorff
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1977-03

9.  Changes in myopic refractive error with nine months' extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability.

Authors:  K A Dumbleton; R L Chalmers; D B Richter; D Fonn
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Myopia progression in adolescent wearers of soft contact lenses and spectacles.

Authors:  D G Horner; P S Soni; T O Salmon; T S Swartz
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.973

  10 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical management of progressive myopia.

Authors:  T A Aller
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Epidemiology, genetics and treatments for myopia.

Authors:  Lei Yu; Zhi-Kui Li; Jin-Rong Gao; Jian-Rong Liu; Chang-Tai Xu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 3.  Myopia onset and progression: can it be prevented?

Authors:  Andrea Russo; Francesco Semeraro; Mario R Romano; Rodolfo Mastropasqua; Roberto Dell'Omo; Ciro Costagliola
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Acupuncture for adolescents with mild-to-moderate myopia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Yun-xian Gao; Qi Sun; Qian Bu; Jing Shi; Ya-ni Zhang; Qin Xu; Yan Ji; Min Tong; Guang-li Jiang
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Effect of bilberry extract on slowing high-myopia progression in children: 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Ismail Ahmed Nagib Omar
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.