Literature DB >> 10445639

Myopia progression in adolescent wearers of soft contact lenses and spectacles.

D G Horner1, P S Soni, T O Salmon, T S Swartz.   

Abstract

The purpose of this 3-year, randomized clinical trial was to determine the difference in myopia progression in adolescents wearing soft contact lenses over a control group wearing spectacles. A total of 175 adolescents between the ages of 11 and 14 years were randomized into 2 groups, spectacle wearers and soft contact lens wearers. The main result was that the spherical equivalent change between the groups showed no clinical or statistically significant difference. However, when a power vector analysis was used, which uses all the refractive error data, a small but statistically significant (F test = 4.24, T2 = 17.35, p < 0.01) difference between the groups was found (i.e., the refractive error of the spectacle wearers had a slight increase in astigmatism). It can be concluded that soft contact lens wear does not lead to additional myopia progression in adolescents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10445639     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199907000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  15 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Kristina Lindsley; Satyanarayana S Vedula; Susan A Cotter; Donald O Mutti; J Daniel Twelker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

2.  A Randomized Trial of Soft Multifocal Contact Lenses for Myopia Control: Baseline Data and Methods.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Amber Gaume Giannoni; Loraine T Sinnott; Moriah A Chandler; Juan Huang; Donald O Mutti; Lisa A Jones-Jordan; David A Berntsen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Gas permeable and soft contact lens wear in children.

Authors:  Lisa A Jones-Jordan; Jeffrey J Walline; Donald O Mutti; Marjorie J Rah; Kelly K Nichols; Jason J Nichols; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 4.  Myopia: attempts to arrest progression.

Authors:  S M Saw; G Gazzard; K-G Au Eong; D T H Tan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?

Authors:  Raimundo Jiménez; Loreto Martínez-Almeida; Carlos Salas; Carolina Ortíz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Peripheral refraction with and without contact lens correction.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Christopher A Clark; P Sarita Soni; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  An evidence-based update on myopia and interventions to retard its progression.

Authors:  Seo-Wei Leo; Terri L Young
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.220

8.  Myopia Progression in Children Wearing Spectacles vs. Switching to Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Wendy L Marsh-Tootle; Li Ming Dong; Leslie Hyman; Jane Gwiazda; Katherine K Weise; Lynette Dias; Karen D Fernp
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Adverse events during 2 years of daily wear of silicone hydrogels in children.

Authors:  Padmaja Sankaridurg; Xiang Chen; Thomas Naduvilath; Percy Lazon de la Jara; Zhi Lin; Li Li; Earl L Smith; Jian Ge; Brien A Holden
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Myopia progression during three years of soft contact lens wear.

Authors:  Adam Blacker; G Lynn Mitchell; Mark A Bullimore; Bill Long; Joseph T Barr; Sally M Dillehay; Peter Bergenske; Peter Donshik; Glenda Secor; John Yoakum; Robin L Chalmers
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.