AIMS: Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec/Glivec), which has revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemias (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), has been reported to cause gastric upset. Consequently, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are frequently co-administered with imatinib. Because PPI can elevate gastric pH and delay gastric emptying or antagonize ATP-binding-cassette transporters, they could influence imatinib absorption and pharmacokinetics. We aimed to evaluate whether use of omeprazole has a significant effect on imatinib pharmacokinetics. METHODS:Twelve healthy subjects were enrolled in a two-period, open-label, single-institution, randomized cross-over, fixed-schedule study. In one period, each subject received 400 mg imatinib orally. In the other period, 40 mg omeprazole (Prilosec) was administered orally for 5 days, and on day 5 it was administered 15 min before 400 mg imatinib. Plasma concentrations of imatinib and its active N-desmethyl metabolite CGP74588 were assayed by LC-MS, and data were analyzed non-compartmentally. RESULTS: PPI administration did not significantly affect the imatinib area under the plasma concentration vs time curve (AUC) (34.1 microg ml(-1) h alone vs 33.1 microg ml(-1) h with omeprazole, P= 0.64; 80% power), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) (2.04 microg ml(-1) alone vs 2.02 microg ml(-1) with omeprazole, P= 0.97), or half-life (13.4 h alone vs 14.1 h with omeprazole, P= 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the use of omeprazole does not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of imatinib, as opposed to, for example, dasatinib where PPI decreased AUC and C(max) two-fold.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec/Glivec), which has revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemias (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), has been reported to cause gastric upset. Consequently, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are frequently co-administered with imatinib. Because PPI can elevate gastric pH and delay gastric emptying or antagonize ATP-binding-cassette transporters, they could influence imatinib absorption and pharmacokinetics. We aimed to evaluate whether use of omeprazole has a significant effect on imatinib pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Twelve healthy subjects were enrolled in a two-period, open-label, single-institution, randomized cross-over, fixed-schedule study. In one period, each subject received 400 mg imatinib orally. In the other period, 40 mg omeprazole (Prilosec) was administered orally for 5 days, and on day 5 it was administered 15 min before 400 mg imatinib. Plasma concentrations of imatinib and its active N-desmethyl metabolite CGP74588 were assayed by LC-MS, and data were analyzed non-compartmentally. RESULTS: PPI administration did not significantly affect the imatinib area under the plasma concentration vs time curve (AUC) (34.1 microg ml(-1) h alone vs 33.1 microg ml(-1) h with omeprazole, P= 0.64; 80% power), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) (2.04 microg ml(-1) alone vs 2.02 microg ml(-1) with omeprazole, P= 0.97), or half-life (13.4 h alone vs 14.1 h with omeprazole, P= 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the use of omeprazole does not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of imatinib, as opposed to, for example, dasatinib where PPI decreased AUC and C(max) two-fold.
Authors: Martin H Cohen; Grant Williams; John R Johnson; John Duan; Jogarao Gobburu; Atiqur Rahman; Kimberly Benson; John Leighton; Sung K Kim; Rebecca Wood; Mark Rothmann; Gang Chen; Khin Maung U; Ann M Staten; Richard Pazdur Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Pauline Breedveld; Dick Pluim; Greta Cipriani; Peter Wielinga; Olaf van Tellingen; Alfred H Schinkel; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: B J Druker; M Talpaz; D J Resta; B Peng; E Buchdunger; J M Ford; N B Lydon; H Kantarjian; R Capdeville; S Ohno-Jones; C L Sawyers Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-04-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: B J Druker; C L Sawyers; H Kantarjian; D J Resta; S F Reese; J M Ford; R Capdeville; M Talpaz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-04-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Pauline Breedveld; Noam Zelcer; Dick Pluim; Ozgür Sönmezer; Matthijs M Tibben; Jos H Beijnen; Alfred H Schinkel; Olaf van Tellingen; Piet Borst; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Roos L Oostendorp; Tessa Buckle; Jos H Beijnen; Olaf van Tellingen; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Charles D Blanke; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Burton Eisenberg; Peter J Roberts; Michael C Heinrich; David A Tuveson; Samuel Singer; Milos Janicek; Jonathan A Fletcher; Stuart G Silverman; Sandra L Silberman; Renaud Capdeville; Beate Kiese; Bin Peng; Sasa Dimitrijevic; Brian J Druker; Christopher Corless; Christopher D M Fletcher; Heikki Joensuu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert A Parise; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Michael J Hayes; Merrill J Egorin Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2003-07-05 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Brian D Furmanski; Shuiying Hu; Ken-Ichi Fujita; Lie Li; Alice A Gibson; Laura J Janke; Richard T Williams; John D Schuetz; Alex Sparreboom; Sharyn D Baker Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ophelia Q P Yin; Frank J Giles; Michele Baccarani; Philipp le Coutre; Ovidiu Chiparus; Neil Gallagher; Giuseppe Saglio; Timothy P Hughes; Andreas Hochhaus; Hagop M Kantarjian; Richard A Larson Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 3.333