PURPOSE: The impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2 blockers) on the efficacy of nilotinib was evaluated. METHODS: Retrospective analyses were performed in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP; N = 492) and in patients with imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant Ph+ CML-CP (N = 256) treated with nilotinib. RESULTS: In the newly diagnosed population, 87 (17.7 %) and 49 (10.0 %) patients received PPIs and H2 blockers, respectively. Major molecular response at 12 months was achieved by 59 (49.6 %) patients who received at least one PPI or H2 blocker (n = 119) and 153 (41.0 %) patients who did not receive any comedication (n = 373; P = 0.13). PPIs and H2 blockers were used by 77 (30.1 %) and 17 (6.6 %) patients with imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant CML-CP, respectively. Major cytogenetic response by 12 months was achieved by 55 (64.0 %) patients who received at least one PPI or H2 blocker (n = 86) versus 98 (57.6 %) patients who did not receive any comedication (n = 170; P = 0.40); 39 (45.3 %) versus 65 (38.2 %), respectively, achieved complete cytogenetic response by 12 months (P = 0.34). Similar findings were observed in patients who received comedication for >50 % of the time on nilotinib therapy. Nilotinib steady-state trough concentration was not affected by the presence of PPIs or H2 blockers. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent use of PPIs or H2 blockers did not affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of nilotinib in patients with Ph+ CML-CP.
PURPOSE: The impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2 blockers) on the efficacy of nilotinib was evaluated. METHODS: Retrospective analyses were performed in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP; N = 492) and in patients with imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant Ph+ CML-CP (N = 256) treated with nilotinib. RESULTS: In the newly diagnosed population, 87 (17.7 %) and 49 (10.0 %) patients received PPIs and H2 blockers, respectively. Major molecular response at 12 months was achieved by 59 (49.6 %) patients who received at least one PPI or H2 blocker (n = 119) and 153 (41.0 %) patients who did not receive any comedication (n = 373; P = 0.13). PPIs and H2 blockers were used by 77 (30.1 %) and 17 (6.6 %) patients with imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant CML-CP, respectively. Major cytogenetic response by 12 months was achieved by 55 (64.0 %) patients who received at least one PPI or H2 blocker (n = 86) versus 98 (57.6 %) patients who did not receive any comedication (n = 170; P = 0.40); 39 (45.3 %) versus 65 (38.2 %), respectively, achieved complete cytogenetic response by 12 months (P = 0.34). Similar findings were observed in patients who received comedication for >50 % of the time on nilotinib therapy. Nilotinib steady-state trough concentration was not affected by the presence of PPIs or H2 blockers. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent use of PPIs or H2 blockers did not affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of nilotinib in patients with Ph+ CML-CP.
Authors: C Martínez; C Albet; J A Agúndez; E Herrero; J A Carrillo; M Márquez; J Benítez; J A Ortiz Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Desiree L Tomilo; Patrick F Smith; Abayomi B Ogundele; Robin Difrancesco; Charles S Berenson; Ellana Eberhardt; Edward Bednarczyk; Gene D Morse Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Giuseppe Saglio; Dong-Wook Kim; Surapol Issaragrisil; Philipp le Coutre; Gabriel Etienne; Clarisse Lobo; Ricardo Pasquini; Richard E Clark; Andreas Hochhaus; Timothy P Hughes; Neil Gallagher; Albert Hoenekopp; Mei Dong; Ariful Haque; Richard A Larson; Hagop M Kantarjian Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hagop M Kantarjian; Andreas Hochhaus; Giuseppe Saglio; Carmino De Souza; Ian W Flinn; Leif Stenke; Yeow-Tee Goh; Gianantonio Rosti; Hirohisa Nakamae; Neil J Gallagher; Albert Hoenekopp; Rick E Blakesley; Richard A Larson; Timothy P Hughes Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Hagop M Kantarjian; Francis Giles; Norbert Gattermann; Kapil Bhalla; Giuliana Alimena; Francesca Palandri; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Franck-Emmanuel Nicolini; Stephen G O'Brien; Mark Litzow; Ravi Bhatia; Francisco Cervantes; Ariful Haque; Yaping Shou; Debra J Resta; Aaron Weitzman; Andreas Hochhaus; Philipp le Coutre Journal: Blood Date: 2007-08-22 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Harry Hochheiser; Xia Jing; Elizabeth A Garcia; Serkan Ayvaz; Ratnesh Sahay; Michel Dumontier; Juan M Banda; Oya Beyan; Mathias Brochhausen; Evan Draper; Sam Habiel; Oktie Hassanzadeh; Maria Herrero-Zazo; Brian Hocum; John Horn; Brian LeBaron; Daniel C Malone; Øystein Nytrø; Thomas Reese; Katrina Romagnoli; Jodi Schneider; Louisa Yu Zhang; Richard D Boyce Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 5.810