Literature DB >> 19739759

Cross-language categorization of French and German vowels by naive American listeners.

Winifred Strange1, Erika S Levy, Franzo F Law.   

Abstract

American English (AE) speakers' perceptual assimilation of 14 North German (NG) and 9 Parisian French (PF) vowels was examined in two studies using citation-form disyllables (study 1) and sentences with vowels surrounded by labial and alveolar consonants in multisyllabic nonsense words (study 2). Listeners categorized multiple tokens of each NG and PF vowel as most similar to selected AE vowels and rated their category "goodness" on a nine-point Likert scale. Front, rounded vowels were assimilated primarily to back AE vowels, despite their acoustic similarity to front AE vowels. In study 1, they were considered poorer exemplars of AE vowels than were NG and PF back, rounded vowels; in study 2, front and back, rounded vowels were perceived as similar to each other. Assimilation of some front, unrounded and back, rounded NG and PF vowels varied with language, speaking style, and consonantal context. Differences in perceived similarity often could not be predicted from context-specific cross-language spectral similarities. Results suggest that listeners can access context-specific, phonetic details when listening to citation-form materials, but assimilate non-native vowels on the basis of context-independent phonological equivalence categories when processing continuous speech. Results are interpreted within the Automatic Selective Perception model of speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19739759      PMCID: PMC2757423          DOI: 10.1121/1.3179666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels.

Authors:  Winifred Strange; Ocke-Schwen Bohn; Sonja A Trent; Kanae Nishi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Contextual variation in the acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels.

Authors:  Winifred Strange; Ocke-Schwen Bohn; Kanae Nishi; Sonja A Trent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: phonetic context effects.

Authors:  Winifred Strange; Andrea Weber; Erika S Levy; Valeriy Shafiro; Miwako Hisagi; Kanae Nishi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Tessa Bent
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-29

5.  Language experience and consonantal context effects on perceptual assimilation of French vowels by American-English learners of French.

Authors:  Erika S Levy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of consonant environment on vowel formant patterns.

Authors:  J M Hillenbrand; M J Clark; T M Nearey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perception of temporal and spectral information in French vowels.

Authors:  T L Gottfried; P S Beddor
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1988 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.500

8.  Linguistic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts.

Authors:  L Polka
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory and categorical effects on cross-language vowel perception.

Authors:  J E Flege; M J Munro; R A Fox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Cross-language perceptual similarity predicts categorial discrimination of American vowels by naïve Japanese listeners.

Authors:  Winifred Strange; Miwako Hisagi; Reiko Akahane-Yamada; Rieko Kubo
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustical analysis of Canadian French word-final vowels in varying phonetic contexts.

Authors:  Franzo Law; Winifred Strange
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Training a non-native vowel contrast with a distributional learning paradigm results in improved perception and production.

Authors:  Heather Kabakoff; Gretchen Go; Susannah V Levi
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2019-12-13

4.  On the assimilation-discrimination relationship in American English adults' French vowel learning.

Authors:  Erika S Levy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Early phonetic learning without phonetic categories: Insights from large-scale simulations on realistic input.

Authors:  Thomas Schatz; Naomi H Feldman; Sharon Goldwater; Xuan-Nga Cao; Emmanuel Dupoux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts.

Authors:  Michael D Tyler; Catherine T Best; Alice Faber; Andrea G Levitt
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  Influences of listeners' native and other dialects on cross-language vowel perception.

Authors:  Daniel Williams; Paola Escudero
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-07

8.  Neurophysiological and Behavioral Responses of Mandarin Lexical Tone Processing.

Authors:  Yan H Yu; Valerie L Shafer; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  The Duration of Auditory Sensory Memory for Vowel Processing: Neurophysiological and Behavioral Measures.

Authors:  Yan H Yu; Valerie L Shafer; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-22

10.  Geospatial distributions reflect temperatures of linguistic features.

Authors:  Henri Kauhanen; Deepthi Gopal; Tobias Galla; Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 14.136

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.