Literature DB >> 15101657

Acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels.

Winifred Strange1, Ocke-Schwen Bohn, Sonja A Trent, Kanae Nishi.   

Abstract

Current theories of cross-language speech perception claim that patterns of perceptual assimilation of non-native segments to native categories predict relative difficulties in learning to perceive (and produce) non-native phones. Cross-language spectral similarity of North German (NG) and American English (AE) vowels produced in isolated hVC(a) (di)syllables (study 1) and in hVC syllables embedded in a short sentence (study 2) was determined by discriminant analyses, to examine the extent to which acoustic similarity was predictive of perceptual similarity patterns. The perceptual assimilation of NG vowels to native AE vowel categories by AE listeners with no German language experience was then assessed directly. Both studies showed that acoustic similarity of AE and NG vowels did not always predict perceptual similarity, especially for "new" NG front rounded vowels and for "similar" NG front and back mid and mid-low vowels. Both acoustic and perceptual similarity of NG and AE vowels varied as a function of the prosodic context, although vowel duration differences did not affect perceptual assimilation patterns. When duration and spectral similarity were in conflict, AE listeners assimilated vowels on the basis of spectral similarity in both prosodic contexts.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15101657     DOI: 10.1121/1.1687832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Language experience and consonantal context effects on perceptual assimilation of French vowels by American-English learners of French.

Authors:  Erika S Levy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cross-language categorization of French and German vowels by naive American listeners.

Authors:  Winifred Strange; Erika S Levy; Franzo F Law
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts.

Authors:  Michael D Tyler; Catherine T Best; Alice Faber; Andrea G Levitt
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  Nonnative speech perception training using vowel subsets: effects of vowels in sets and order of training.

Authors:  Kanae Nishi; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Acoustic and perceptual similarity of Japanese and American English vowels.

Authors:  Kanae Nishi; Winifred Strange; Reiko Akahane-Yamada; Rieko Kubo; Sonja A Trent-Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Investigating interaural frequency-place mismatches via bimodal vowel integration.

Authors:  François Guérit; Sébastien Santurette; Josef Chalupper; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Spanish is better than English for discriminating Portuguese vowels: acoustic similarity versus vowel inventory size.

Authors:  Jaydene Elvin; Paola Escudero; Polina Vasiliev
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-29

8.  Acoustic Properties Predict Perception of Unfamiliar Dutch Vowels by Adult Australian English and Peruvian Spanish Listeners.

Authors:  Samra Alispahic; Karen E Mulak; Paola Escudero
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-27

9.  Differences in perceptual assimilation following training.

Authors:  Heather Kabakoff; Julia Kharlamenko; Erika S Levy; Susannah V Levi
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2021-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.