AIMS: The study sought to define the long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of a bio-engineered stent, able to sequester endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) to the stent to promote the post-stenting vascular repair response. METHODS AND RESULTS: The HEALING-II was a multicentre, prospective registry, including 63 patients treated with the implantation of a Genous EPC capture stent. Serial quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis was performed at 6 and 18 month. The 18 month composite MACE rate was 7.9%, whereas 6.3% clinically justified target lesion revascularisations were observed. Although patients received one month of clopidogrel, no (sub)acute or late angiographic stent thrombosis occurred. At 6 month follow-up, in-stent late luminal loss was 0.78+/-0.39 mm and percent in-stent volume obstruction was 22.9+/-13.7% (mean+/-sd). Serial angiographic and IVUS analyses were available in 30 event-free patients at post-procedure, 6 months and 18 months. From 6 months to 18 months follow-up, a significant late regression of neointimal hyperplasia was observed on QCA (late luminal loss 0.59+/-0.31, 24.4% reduction or 16.9% by matched serial analysis) and IVUS (percent in-stent volume obstruction 20.3+/-14.3%, 11.4% reduction or 9.6% by matched serial analysis). The relative increase in circulating EPC titers at long-term follow-up correlated with neointimal compaction in individual patients, suggestive of an EPC-mediated vascular repair response. CONCLUSIONS: The HEALING II study suggests that the EPC capture stent, aimed to stimulate the coronary vascular repair response, significantly promotes late regression of neointimal hyperplasia up to 18 months after stent implantation.
AIMS: The study sought to define the long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of a bio-engineered stent, able to sequester endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) to the stent to promote the post-stenting vascular repair response. METHODS AND RESULTS: The HEALING-II was a multicentre, prospective registry, including 63 patients treated with the implantation of a Genous EPC capture stent. Serial quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis was performed at 6 and 18 month. The 18 month composite MACE rate was 7.9%, whereas 6.3% clinically justified target lesion revascularisations were observed. Although patients received one month of clopidogrel, no (sub)acute or late angiographic stent thrombosis occurred. At 6 month follow-up, in-stent late luminal loss was 0.78+/-0.39 mm and percent in-stent volume obstruction was 22.9+/-13.7% (mean+/-sd). Serial angiographic and IVUS analyses were available in 30 event-free patients at post-procedure, 6 months and 18 months. From 6 months to 18 months follow-up, a significant late regression of neointimal hyperplasia was observed on QCA (late luminal loss 0.59+/-0.31, 24.4% reduction or 16.9% by matched serial analysis) and IVUS (percent in-stent volume obstruction 20.3+/-14.3%, 11.4% reduction or 9.6% by matched serial analysis). The relative increase in circulating EPC titers at long-term follow-up correlated with neointimal compaction in individual patients, suggestive of an EPC-mediated vascular repair response. CONCLUSIONS: The HEALING II study suggests that the EPC capture stent, aimed to stimulate the coronary vascular repair response, significantly promotes late regression of neointimal hyperplasia up to 18 months after stent implantation.
Authors: Margo Klomp; Peter Damman; Marcel A M Beijk; Sigmund Silber; Manfred Grisold; Expedito E Ribeiro; Harry Suryapranata; Jaroslaw Wòjcik; Kui Hian Sim; Jan G P Tijssen; Robbert J de Winter Journal: Heart Vessels Date: 2011-07-02 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Margo Klomp; Claudia M van Tiel; Anita M Klous; Marcel A M Beijk; Margriet I Klees; Esther M Scheunhage; Jan G P Tijssen; Carlie J M de Vries; Robbert J de Winter Journal: Heart Asia Date: 2011-01-01
Authors: Brandon J Tefft; Susheil Uthamaraj; Adriana Harbuzariu; J Jonathan Harburn; Tyra A Witt; Brant Newman; Peter J Psaltis; Ota Hlinomaz; David R Holmes; Rajiv Gulati; Robert D Simari; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Gurpreet S Sandhu Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Brandon J Tefft; Susheil Uthamaraj; J Jonathan Harburn; Martin Klabusay; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Gurpreet S Sandhu Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Robert Jan van Geuns; Evelyn Regar; Willem J van der Giessen; Henning Kelbæk; Kari Saunamäki; Javier Escaned; Nieves Gonzalo; Carlo di Mario; Francesco Borgia; Eveline Nüesch; Héctor M García-García; Sigmund Silber; Stephan Windecker; Patrick W Serruys Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Katarína Larsen; Caroline Cheng; Dennie Tempel; Sherry Parker; Saami Yazdani; Wijnand K den Dekker; Jaco H Houtgraaf; Renate de Jong; Stijn Swager-ten Hoor; Erik Ligtenberg; Stephen R Hanson; Steve Rowland; Frank Kolodgie; Patrick W Serruys; Renu Virmani; Henricus J Duckers Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Marcel A M Beijk; Margo Klomp; Niels J W Verouden; Nan van Geloven; Karel T Koch; José P S Henriques; Jan Baan; Marije M Vis; Esther Scheunhage; Jan J Piek; Jan G P Tijssen; Robbert J de Winter Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 29.983