Literature DB >> 19737687

Circulating endothelial progenitor cells predict angiographic and intravascular ultrasound outcome following percutaneous coronary interventions in the HEALING-II trial: evaluation of an endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent.

Henricus J Duckers1, Sigmund Silber, Robbert de Winter, Peter den Heijer, Benno Rensing, Matthias Rau, Harald Mudra, Edouard Benit, Stefan Verheye, William Wijns, Patrick W Serruys.   

Abstract

AIMS: In contrast to the cytostatic and cytotoxic pharmacotherapy of drug eluting stents, approaches to stimulate the arterial healing response by accelerating re-endothelialisation may be an attractive alternative to prevent post-stenting neointimal formation and thrombosis. The study sought to evaluate whether stainless steel stents able to sequester endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) to the stent surface to promote the endogenous arterial healing, can prevent in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The HEALING-II study was a multicentre, prospective registry study, including 63 patients treated with the implantation of a Genous EPC capture stent. The primary safety endpoint was Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 30 days, whereas the primary efficacy endpoint was percent in-stent volume obstruction at 6 months by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The 9 month composite MACE rate was 7.9%, whereas 6.3% clinically justified target lesion revascularisations were observed. Although patients received one month of clopidogrel, no angiographic stent thrombosis occurred. In-stent late luminal loss was 0.78+/-0.39 mm and percent in-stent volume obstruction was 22.9+/-13.7% (mean+/-sd). Patients with normal EPC titers at 6 months FU responded favourably to the EPC capturing stent (late luminal loss 0.53+/-0.06) as opposed to patients with low EPC titers (late luminal loss 1.01+/-0.07). These low circulating EPC titers were generally associated with the lack of HMG-Co-A reductase inhibitors ('statins') at the time of stent implantation and diabetes mellitus.
CONCLUSIONS: The HEALING-II study suggests that the EPC capture coronary stents are safe and effective for the treatment of de novo coronary artery disease in patients with normal EPC levels.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 19737687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  18 in total

1.  Drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Xiaodong Ma; Tim Wu; Michael P Robich; Xingwei Wang; Hao Wu; Bryan Buchholz; Stephen McCarthy
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2010-07-15

2.  Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity allows reliable EPC enumeration in stored peripheral blood samples.

Authors:  Thomas J Povsic; Stacie D Adams; Katherine L Zavodni; Francine Kelly; Laura G Melton; Sunil V Rao; Samer S Najjar; Robert A Harrington; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Prohealing endothelial progenitor cell capture stents: do the cells captured explain the clinical outcomes?

Authors:  Jane A Leopold
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 6.546

4.  Applying the National Institute for Clinical Excellence criteria to patients treated with the Genous™ Bio-engineered R stent™: a sub-study of the e-HEALING (Healthy Endothelial Accelerated Lining Inhibits Neointimal Growth) worldwide registry.

Authors:  Margo Klomp; Peter Damman; Marcel A M Beijk; Sigmund Silber; Manfred Grisold; Expedito E Ribeiro; Harry Suryapranata; Jaroslaw Wòjcik; Kui Hian Sim; Jan G P Tijssen; Robbert J de Winter
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  The relationship between the number of preprocedural circulating endothelial progenitor cells and angiographic restenosis following coronary artery stent placement.

Authors:  Margo Klomp; Claudia M van Tiel; Anita M Klous; Marcel A M Beijk; Margriet I Klees; Esther M Scheunhage; Jan G P Tijssen; Carlie J M de Vries; Robbert J de Winter
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 6.  Drug-coated balloons for coronary and peripheral interventional procedures.

Authors:  Jochen Wöhrle
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Vulnerable plaque: from bench to bedside; local pacification versus systemic therapy.

Authors:  Sazzli Kasim; Darragh Moran; Eugene McFadden
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2012-10

8.  Tissue coverage of a hydrophilic polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent vs. a fluoropolymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent at 13-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography substudy from the RESOLUTE All Comers trial.

Authors:  Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Robert Jan van Geuns; Evelyn Regar; Willem J van der Giessen; Henning Kelbæk; Kari Saunamäki; Javier Escaned; Nieves Gonzalo; Carlo di Mario; Francesco Borgia; Eveline Nüesch; Héctor M García-García; Sigmund Silber; Stephan Windecker; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Capture of circulatory endothelial progenitor cells and accelerated re-endothelialization of a bio-engineered stent in human ex vivo shunt and rabbit denudation model.

Authors:  Katarína Larsen; Caroline Cheng; Dennie Tempel; Sherry Parker; Saami Yazdani; Wijnand K den Dekker; Jaco H Houtgraaf; Renate de Jong; Stijn Swager-ten Hoor; Erik Ligtenberg; Stephen R Hanson; Steve Rowland; Frank Kolodgie; Patrick W Serruys; Renu Virmani; Henricus J Duckers
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Genous endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent vs. the Taxus Liberte stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions with a high-risk of coronary restenosis: a randomized, single-centre, pilot study.

Authors:  Marcel A M Beijk; Margo Klomp; Niels J W Verouden; Nan van Geloven; Karel T Koch; José P S Henriques; Jan Baan; Marije M Vis; Esther Scheunhage; Jan J Piek; Jan G P Tijssen; Robbert J de Winter
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.